TOPIC: [TTT] Davey2206 Application

Steam Name: Davey2206
Link to Steam Profile: steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198069616530
SteamID: STEAM_0:0:54675401

Age: 14 (almost 15)

Link to GameTracker for the server: www.gametracker.com/player/davey2206/94.23.19.200:27017/

Languages I speak: Dutch, And average/decent english

Explain "Random Death Match" and give an example scenario: RDM is an player killing another player for no reason, Like I am walking down the street I see a player and i start killing him, Then this is counted as RDM

Give three examples of an acceptable KOS and its scenario:
1) When player is going into T room and get identified, then you can put a KOS on him.
2) If a player is holding a T weapon and he isn't proven, You can put a KOS on him.
3) When a player is starting shooting at you, you can put KOS on him.

Give two examples of unacceptable KOS and their scenarios:
1) When someone is holding a sniper and you dont trust that you can't put KOS on him.
2) When someone threw a smoke grenade at you you can't put KOS on him, but you can have suspicion.

Why I should be chosen (longer answer expected here - at least 75 words):
I wanna be a mod because i hate it when there are no mods or something online (most of the time they do but when they don't) And there come's a troller or an RDM'er that we cant do anything about it, i want to stop those people from trolling my favourite server on Gmod, when i come on Gmod i only play TTT from the zarp server and i really want to help out people.

Thank you for reading my application.

Friendly and mature guy, i see him alot on the server knows the rule's so a
+Big Support from me

Positives :
Friendly
Active
Follows the rules ( most of the time )

Negatives :
"2) When someone threw a smoke grenade at you you can't put KOS on him, but you can have suspicion."
- Someone isn't suspicious if they throw a smoke grenade , it's a useless grenade anyways.
"2) If a player is holding a T weapon and he isn't proven, You can put a KOS on him." - you could have used a better example , for example if they don't give a valid reason for having the T weapon .
And a big negative - glitching with odd chicken ( thanks tom for reminding me ) , if you found a glitch , fine , but don't show it to others, make a post on the forums about it .

You're a good guy and hasn't broke many rules , but the glitching that you've done in the past was pretty bad .
So i'll go with a Neutral

comment #109344

Good points

Activity is decent.

Application is ok but could be better.

Bad points

After seeing the screenshot and comment Tom has provided above, I've to say if this showing other people how to exploit a glitch and get out of a map isn't staff material.

Also you could have answered the questions in greater detail.

My final verdict is -Support, mainly because of the screenshot above and if it's true you showing people how to glitch out of the map that isn't really staff material.

Good luck though.

^.

Well this is weird theoddchicken says its davey that did this, that he exploited and showed theoddchicken,
And to me he tells it was theoddchicken who showed it to everyone, keep that in mind that you only heard theoddchicken verdict and didnt hear davey about it

i did not tell anyone TheOddChicken did

Got to speak to him and the situation was made clear.
He did indeed show the glitch to OddChicken which wasnt a smart thing to do but yet he wasnt the person showing it to everyone else. That was indeed OddChicken.

So after that I do have to say you are friendly and mature. Your app does need some work.
davey2206 wrote:
When someone says they have found/picked up a T weapon. You can't KOS them. For example I find an AWP but im not proven. I say in chat: "I found aw AWP". Then you can't KOS me.[/quote]

tomvtv wrote: [/quote]

So practically you are saying wait 1 or 2 weeks for next application (if he doesn't get accepted) and get a bit better knowledge of rules. dont ya tom

First and foremost, we'd like to thank you for making the effort to apply for a rank on the ZARP TTT server. Your application has been discussed at an administrative meeting, and from there it has been voted on.


Unfortunately as more staff members voted 'no' than 'yes', the application has been denied.

However, the meeting host has taken some criticisms made by the admins and provided you with this feedback:You are welcome to apply again at any point.
.