TOPIC: [SSRP Moderator] Beast Bread's Application

RP Name:
Beast Bread

Link to Steam Profile:
steamcommunity.com/id/UnrelentedSlayer/

SteamID:
STEAM_0:1:40131982

Current Gametracker Profiles:
Server 1 - www.gametracker.com/player/Beast%20Bread/94.23.19.200:27015/
Server 2 - www.gametracker.com/player/Beast%20Bread/94.23.19.200:27025/

Age:
15

Estimated Server Time:
1688 minutes (Aprox. 28 hrs)

Languages I speak:
English

Explain "Random Death Match" and give an example scenario:
Random Death Match (Otherwise known as RDM) - A situation where player X has randomly killed player Y.
Player X respawns and equips an M249, then shoots everyone he sees.

Explain "New Life Rule" and give an example scenario:
New Life Rule (Otherwise known as NLR) - You cannot return to the past area of your death until the timer at the top of your screen goes away.
Player X was raided one minute ago and killed, he returns to his base as soon as he respawns to possibly kill the raiders.

Explain "Metagaming" and give an example scenario:
Metagaming - Using the none in-game chat for a RP related problem or statement.
Player X says in OOC: "I'm selling guns for 10k. /pm me"

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for RDMing him, the console log shows that player y killed player x.
-I would teleport both players to me, ask them their sides of the story. If player Y has an un-legit reason to kill him, I will warn him. And if player X's story can be proven by possible witnesses, I will warn player Y.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for breaking NLR, the kills are pretty close together in console (a few lines apart) at a peak time.
- I will bring them both to me and ask player Y to tell me the truth, if he doesn't comply, I will warn him for lying to a moderator.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x calls for help in the OOC chat because his bank is being raided.
- I would warn him for metagaming and that he cannot use OOC chat for an in-game problem (unless he is stuck in a wall or something where no normal player can help, but would tell that person to use F1 next time). I would then warn him if he continues to use OOC to metagame, and warn him some more if he continues even after the first warning.

Why I should be chosen (we recommend around 150 words):
I should be chosen for moderator because I have been a moderator before in ZARP DarkRP. I was never reported for abusing my powers. I am good at dealing with problems. I am also a very friendly person. I will be very responsible with my position as a moderator. I can help with anything at any time. I am also very experienced with DarkRP and ZARP DarkRP. I am respectful to others. I can help new players if they need anything. I am also a very understanding person. I would never abuse my powers for my own use. I can deal with problems accordingly. I am also very smart so I will know what to do in most scenarios or situations. I am also a good listener so if someone else asks me or is telling me something, I will listen carefully. I will also be active on the server and forums. This is my second moderator application as well. I have met a few admins and mods and spoken a little bit with some. I feel I am suited for this position because I think I can make the right decisions while enforcing the server rules. I am a trustworthy member of this community. I am also a VIP in the server. I'm experienced in being a moderator as I used to be one for this server until the whole switch happened and moderator could not be purchased any longer. I've been playing a lot lately and have been picking up on how things are dealt with so I think I have already learned a little bit more than I know. I will be active on Teamspeak as well, when I can be. I have also been a moderator before on this server, i just went inactive for a while but I'm reapplying now. But this is why I think I should be chosen for moderator.

here are your last punishments:



Positives

• Application looks alright

Negatives

• Recently warned
• Inactive

I will go for - Support

I wish you good luck with your Application.

-Punishments were posted by Nexize.



Activity-Gametracker is showing a very low amount of activity and overall gametime.

Recent Punishments-You have one punishment that has been given to you more then two weeks ago. I would ignore it since that's the only one that you have and its not recent.

Behavior-Unknown.



Easy to read-Yes. Nice coloring and writing.

Organized-Yes. Everything is spaced right and its all placed in a way that anyone can easily read and see what part of the application they are reading.

Gametracker Links- Both gametracker links are present and are valid.


You need to review the following:
-Random Death Match. I suggest putting in more detail into the scenario.

-Situation number 1. Witnesses do not count. you are supposed to know this if you're applying for this position and think that you're ready. I suggest changing it.

-Situation number 2. You cannot know if its NLR just because its close and 3 minutes haven't passed, Maybe the second death/kill happened at another district/area.

-Situation number 3. I'll give you a hint since you should know this: It doesn't matter if he's stuck. i know its actually quite easy to figure out.


The application looks nice and i can easily read it, but according to your gametracker you don't have much gametime which means you don't have a lot of experience with certain situations on the server, I would give the application more time as it does seem like you have potential in my opinion.


-You need more experience.
-Please review all of your app and make sure its all valid( situations, scenarios and such..).

+Support

Nice App
Good game time

Good luck!

gogo3a wrote: Wait a sec.. did you even look at the gametracker links and actually read the application..?

Ofc not

First and foremost, we'd like to thank you for making the effort to apply for a rank on the ZARP Semi Serious DarkRP. Your application has been discussed at an administrative meeting, and from there it has been voted on.


Unfortunately as more staff members voted 'no' than 'yes', the application has been denied.

The meeting host has taken some criticisms made by the admins and provided you with this feedback:

You are welcome to apply again at any point.