Login to ZARP
|
RP Name
Link to Steam Profile SteamID STEAM_0:0:47152616 Current Gametracker Profiles Server 1 - www.gametracker.com/server_info/94.23.19.200:27015/top_players/ Server 2 - www.gametracker.com/server_info/94.23.19.200:27025/top_players/ Age: 20 Estimated Server Time: 60 hours (ish) Languages I speak: English Explain "Random Death Match" and give an example scenario. When a player Y kills player X for absolutely no reason at all and without warning. For example player X is walking down the road doing nothing at all, and player Y pulls out a rifle and kills them for no valid reason at all. (valid reason could be Playeer Y is a hitman and Player X has a hit on them) Explain "New Life Rule" and give an example scenario. New life rule stops players from returning to the place of their death for 3 minutes. This way it stops players from breaking the Semi-serious role playing nature of the game by exacting revenge on the person who kills them, hence the term "new life rule". The player can return to the area they were killed after 3 minutes. An example of this would be Player X is killed by Player Y while Player Y is defending himself (player Y has a hit on them and Player X is a hitman) . Player X cannot return to the area to get the kill for 3 minutes. Explain "Metagaming" and give an example scenario. An example of metagaming is when someone broadcasts raids in OOC chat (which is generally used for questions) rather than /advert. Additionally metagaming is when someone could see printer text poking through a wall, and then using that as an excuse to raid. An example of this would be Player X asking questions about drugs/printers in OOC chat and then player Y broadcasting a raid on Player X using the information given in OOC Explain how you would handle the following situation: Player x accuses player y for RDMing him, the console log shows that player y killed player x. I would ask player x if he/she has any proof of the kill being an RDM, if they don't then i can't take any action. Explain how you would handle the following situation: Player x accuses player y for breaking NLR, the kills are pretty close together in console (a few lines apart) at a peak time. The fact that they are a few lines apart during a peak time suggests it could be an NLR never the less, i would give the person who has potentially broken NLR a verbal warning - as there is evidence pointing towards them breaking the rules. Explain how you would handle the following situation: Player x calls for help in the OOC chat because his bank is being raided i would give him a verbal warning for metagaming, and suggest he directly pm's a police officer instead Why I should be chosen (we recommend around 150 words). I should be chosen as i am a confident and fair individual , and i believe i understand the rules clearly. In my time i haven't received any warnings as of yet (that i can remember anyways). Im a friendly individual who will take the time to listen to what people have to say, while bearing in mind that they're may be other f1's that i would have to attend. |
|
Last Edit: 10 years 8 months ago by Jarshoowa.
The topic has been locked.
|
Please explain with examples for RDM, NLR and Metagaming but you seem to know the rules. I will check your warnings when I get home
![]() |
|
Ex-PERP Super Admin/Government Supervisor Ex-TTT Admin Ex-SSRP Admin
The topic has been locked.
|
Thanks, ive updated it now
|
|
The topic has been locked.
|
This is looking great!
![]() Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] STEAM_0:0:47152616 |
|
Ex-PERP Super Admin/Government Supervisor Ex-TTT Admin Ex-SSRP Admin
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Jarshoowa
|
Thanks! Ive edited it so it shows my Steam ID
![]() |
|
The topic has been locked.
|
Nice app, havent sen you in f1's, although you could use a bit more time on the server.....
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ] +Support |
|
The topic has been locked.
|
First and foremost, we'd like to thank you for making the effort to apply for a rank on the ZARP Semi Serious DarkRP. Your application has been discussed at an administrative meeting, and from there it has been voted on.
Unfortunately as more staff members voted 'no' than 'yes', the application has been denied. The meeting host has taken some criticisms made by the admins and provided you with this feedback: get to know staff team better You are welcome to apply again at any point. |
|
The topic has been locked.
|