TOPIC: [SSRP] Chase2k's mod app

RP Name: chase2k (has also been Guardian-chase and melon-chase)

Link to Steam Profile: steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198035864361

SteamID: STEAM_0:1:37799316

Current Gametracker Profiles
Server 1 - www.gametracker.com/player/chase2k/94.23.19.200:27015/

Server 2 - www.gametracker.com/player/chase2k/94.23.19.200:27025/

Age: 13

Estimated Server Time: 113 (combined)

DarkRP Related:


Explain "Random Death Match" and give an example scenario.

RDM is a major rule in a lot of dark-rp servers especially zarp. RDM stands for random death match it is where you go around killing someone for no reason but it you kill more than two people while rdming that is called mass rdm and is bannable.

Example: player x is a gun dealer and not selling guns so player y demotes him and player x gets mad and rdm's him and player x finds it fun so he started to kill everyone and after a minute or two an admin banned him for mass rdm and fail-rp


Explain "New Life Rule" and give an example scenario.

New Life Rule (NLR) is another major rule in dark-rp and basically it is where you can't go back to the place you died for 3 min and you can't talk about your past life ether (unless your with a mod or admin).

Example: player x just finished his new cool base and is outside of is and putting a KOS sign on the wall and raiders kill him and brake in and he had a fully upgraded nuclear printer, so he brakes NLR over and over to kill them and that is not acceptable.

Explain "Metagaming" and give an example scenario.
Metagaming is a dark-rp rule and it is where you speak out of character and you need to read the rules to understand it a little more

Example: a player asked for and admin and did not make an f1 so I would to tell him to please stop Metagaming and make an f1 and I will be with you as fast as I can

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for RDMing him, the console log shows that player y killed player x.

I would ask for both of there story's and then ask if he got screen shots if he says no but then says but there was a witness I would bring him to me and ask If he has steen shots of the incident if not I would not be able to use him and if they don't have proof I can't do anything

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for breaking NLR, the kills are pretty close together in console (a few lines apart) at a peak time.

I would ask what he was doing the first time he killed him (so I know it was not rdm) and player x says raiding player y so I then ask player y why he broke NLR if he says what's that or I did not know that was a rule I would warn him ( it is because I know he read the rules and you need to before joining any server read the motd!)

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x calls for help in the OOC chat because his bank is being raided

I would ask for him to stop Metagaming and use the correct format or command in chat for it and if he does not stop Metagaming I would bring him to me and ask him one last time to please stop

Why I should be chosen (longer answer expected here - at least 150 words).

I feel like I should be chosen because when I see people asking for help because there new I go to where they are and explain the basics like the f1's and f4 and explain meatagameing because I did not under stand at first so I asked an admin.
Also I think I should be chosen is because I'm kind and mature and don't get angrey fast so I could handle immature people that run away from admin or moderator situations and ones who won't stop talking while I am and ones who tell me I'm wrong.
And the last reason I think I should be mod is because I know the rules for zarp vary well and do not appreciate it how people brake them and I know how to handle it 1. By pulling them aside and asking why they where rdming or braking other rules that results in warnings or kicked for too many warnings.

Thanks your for taking your own time to read my mod application

I feel like that last sentence was just put there to fill up the 150 words, anyway
Neutral

Thanks for the feed back

=====bump====

Caution: This template is complex and requires focus. So, I might make mistakes, please be patient and report anything wrong by adding me on steam.

Hello, I'm replying to this Staff Application that you made, because I would like to give my feedback/opinion. This template that I've designed includes everything I need to judge you about organized properly for easy reading. I do not mean/intend to offend you in my feedback and I hope that all my criticism and compliments will be taken into consideration. If you find anything I say to be harsh or useless you can report it to me by adding me on steam.


In the first part of my feedback, I'll be judging you based on the info/design found in your application as well as, your time and activity on both servers. Note: No matter our current relation, friends or rivals, I will judge you equally.

Activity: + Support
Time on both servers: + Support
Application's Format: + Support
Application Info: + Support
Additional Note(s) about your Application: Your Gametracker profiles show that you are a very active player with a good amount of time on server 1. Furthermore, your app looks good and well worked on.



In this part of my feedback, I'll be determining my notion over my past experience with you. Note: If I don't know you enough I will simply keep my judgement Neutral not consider other players/staff's opinion unless the meeting is 6 hours due. In addition to that, I want to note to that, in the F1 Situation section, I will deduce my verdict by considering how you perform during an F1 Situation.

F1 Situations: Neutral
Personality: Neutral
Matureness: Neutral
Knowledge of rules: Neutral
Additional Note(s) about you:I've haven't had the chance to spectate or get to know you, so my verdicts will have to remain Neutral for now.


This section will affect a very small part of my opinion and will be counted as only one opinion when counting my verdicts. I will talk about what most people say about your obedience to the rules. Then, I'll chatter about what people say about your activity and time on the server. Next, I will write about what they think of your personality and matureness. Finally, I will judge you on what people say about your application.

Obedience to rules: + Support
Activity and time: + Support
Personality: + Support
Your application: + Support
Part 3's verdict: + Support
Explanation of the result in part 3:After asking a few people I know, who have met you and after reading the replies on your application, I've deduced that most people consider you worthy of moderator.
Summary of my opinion: Due to having the + Supports exceed the amount of - Supports and Neutrals , I will give you a + Support. Note: My opinion is inconsistent until August 16, 2014. Thanks for applying and Good luck!

Final verdict:+ Support

Updates:

Date & Time	Updated info
10:25 AM GMT, 8/13/2014	Posted Reply

Version 3.0.3

Please, DO NOT copy this reply template, as I have worked hard on it and do not wish it to be used by anyone else without my permission.

Thanks Johnny

-support not moderator material, but hey that's just my opinion don't sweat it

-support i dont think a 13 year old should be a staff

I see your concern but a lot of the staff ranges from 13-21

I was admin at age 13.

Some of them are more mature than you may think.

Akbul wrote:
Surely whatever age you are the staff who are 13 or younger are easily more mature than you. Age doesn't depend on maturity, maturity is COMPLETELY separate to age.

SabreTooth wrote:
(Not necessarily... An 8 year old will be more likely to be less mature than a 14 year old... )

I need to see what you are like in-game more before I can make a judgement. Expect this post to be edited in the future with my response..
---

Thanks for all the feedback!!

You're a really nice guy, I see you alot on the server and I think your moderator material c:
+Support

C:

+Support
10/10 player

First and foremost, we'd like to thank you for making the effort to apply for a rank on the ZARP Semi Serious DarkRP. Your application has been discussed at an administrative meeting, and from there it has been voted on.


Unfortunately as more staff members voted 'no' than 'yes', the application has been denied.

However, the meeting host has taken some criticisms made by the admins and provided you with this feedback:

You are welcome to apply again at any point.