TOPIC: [SSRP MODERATOR] Matt Jason's application

Details
RP Name:
Matt Jason

Link to Steam Profile:
www.steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197994708644


Steam ID:
STEAM_0:0:17221458

Current Game Tracker Profile:
www.gametracker.com/player/Riotman248/94.23.19.200:27015/ (Games Server 1)
Note: My gametracker hasn't recorded the time I have played on the second server therefore I cannot find the link.

(www.gametracker.com/player/Riotman248%28.../94.23.19.200:27015/
www.gametracker.com/player/Matt%20%5BHAW.../94.23.19.200:27015/
www.gametracker.com/player/Riotman248%28.../94.23.19.200:27015/)
Note: These are a few of the other game trackers I have had recently. Unfortunately I cannot find the others that have the bulk of my time.

Age:
14

Estimated Server Time:
About 150 hours if you account for the multiple names I have used over the past time I have spent on this server. I.E.(Riotman248, Riotman248(MattHarper), Riotman248(Matt Harper), Matt Jason, and Matt [HAWK].)

Languages I speak:
English (Leaning French and Spanish in school.)

DarkRP Related

Explain "Random Death Match" and give an example scenario.:
Random Death Match or RDM would be defined as Killing or attempting to kill someone for no real roleplay reason. Sally walks out of her home and gets killed by a man for no good reason. ( The man killing her is at fault.)

Explain "New Life Rule" and give an example scenario.:
New Life Rule or NLR would be defined as "Remembering" your past life after you are killed. Sally gets raided and respawns. She imediately runs back to her home to kill the criminals/police. ( She is at fault.)

Explain "Metagaming" and give an example scenario.:
Metagaming would be defined as sharing information using Out of Character or OOC sources. Sally tells Mark that the location of a printer is in James' base. (Over OOC chat ingame...) (She is at fault.)

Explain how you would handle the following situation:

Player x accuses player y for RDMing him, the console log shows that player y killed player x.

1.I would ask the situation and see if something else comes up because with this amount of evidence there can't be a warning that can be 100% sure. (That is why people should be recording.) (I would verbally warn them if no such evidence occurs.)

Explain how you would handle the following situation:

Player x accuses player y for breaking NLR, the kills are pretty close together in console (a few lines apart) at a peak time.

2.Again, I would need more evidence to give a warn, but if sufficient evidence does not occur a verbal warning will be good.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:

Player x calls for help in the OOC chat because his bank is being raided

3.I would tell player x that they are doing what is called metagaming and warn them both verbally and in game.

Why I should be chosen:
I have spent my fair share of time on the server. Even though I have seen many rules broken and have been helpless or have broken them and were sorry for them later. I think that I would be a good moderator. I am good at debating, crowd control (as in calming people down), and helping admins and others have a great time. I do have experience with being an Admin, Moderator, or staff on servers. I have been part of the staff or Owner on: a TTT server called Arcadia Gaming (Now shut down due to lack of money.) and a Minecraft server which I was owner of. I know I have my fair share of bad qualities, but everyone can't be perfect all of the time. Even though I have broken the rules before, I have sincerely admitted it and taken the punishment. But, I think I would be good for the job of helping the staff take on the horde of F1s and keep other players like myself from making the same mistakes I have. I hope I haven't wasted your time with this app and look forward to playing with you all...

Yes... I am back, and ready to take on being a Moderator again. I promise i won't leave without telling anyone this time.

First and foremost, we'd like to thank you for making the effort to apply for a rank on the ZARP Semi Serious DarkRP. Your application has been discussed at an administrative meeting, and from there it has been voted on.


Unfortunately as more staff members voted 'no' than 'yes', the application has been denied.

However, the meeting host has taken some criticisms made by the admins and provided you with this feedback:

You are welcome to apply again at any point.