TOPIC: [SSRP Moderator] Nameful's application.

Username: Matthew Nameful Harper

Link to Steam profile:http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198040139398

SteamID: STEAM_0:0:39936835

Current Gametracker Profiles
Server 1 - www.gametracker.com/server_info/94.23.19...ameful&Search=Search
Server 2 - www.gametracker.com/server_info/94.23.19...ameful&Search=Search

Age: 14

Estimated server time: ~365 hours

Languages I speak: Polish, english and german (I speak german very poorly though)

Explain "Random deathmatch" and give an example scenario.
Random deathmatch (in short RDM) is attacking another player without a valid reason.
For example: Player A kills Player B because Player A doesn't like people with blonde hair.

Explain "New Life Rule" and give an example scenario.
New life rule (NLR) is a rule that disallows a player to come back to the area where they died for 3 minutes and to remember everything that happened in their past life.
Example: Player A gets killed by Player B with a valid reason and Player A comes back to the place where he died and starts to call the cops.

Explain "Metagaming" and give an example scenario.
Metagaming is using IC (In character) info in OOC (Out of character) or vice versa.
For example: Player A's base is getting raided, so he calls the Police in the OOC chat.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player A accuses Player B of RDMing him, the console log shows that Player A killed Player B.
I would teleport both players to a safe spot and ask Player B why he killed Player A.
If Player B gives an appropriate reason, I would seek for any kind of proof (console logs or video/screenshots evidence) and investigate the situation further by talking with both players. If I wouldn't get any more information or proof, I would just put them back down.
Although, if Player B would give an inappropriate reason, I would tell him that he's not allowed to kill somebody for that reason and warn him afterwards.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player A accuses Player B of breaking NLR, the kills are pretty close together in console (a few lines apart) at a peak time.
I would teleport both players to a safe, quiet place and ask Player B why he broke NLR. If he would say he didn't, I would ask him why he got killed by the same person twice.
If I get a valid reason, I would investigate the situation further asking for evidence, looking for proof and asking both players what happened.
If I wouldn't find anything, I would just put them back into roleplay.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player A calls for help in the OOC chat because his bank is being raided.
I would verbally warn (or normal warn if he would have any other warns) Player A for metagaming and would tell him he's not allowed to speak ICly in an OOC chat.

Why I should be chosen: I should be chosen because I am a friendly person dedicated to my job always loving to help people in need. I follow the rules strictly and I have a strong personality, I am able to deal with big pressure and responsibilities.
I have been on ZARP since January 2014 and have been a trusted member ever since, I was even accepted for Moderator and promoted to Admin a week after. I never abused my powers and always dealt with F1s in an unbiased way.
I am very active and I like to socialize with people. I want to help the community by achieving the Moderator rank and dealing with rule breakers in a fair, friendly way.
I am able to stay Mod on duty for a long period of time when there is no Staff online and the server is going to hell.
I do not mind the rank, what I really seek when I am applying is to help other players in their daily struggles with rule breakers.

You were a good moderator back when I was active. You know the rules, already have experience and know how to deal with most, if not every, situation.

+SUPPORT

YES! YES! YES!

HUUUGE +Support!

Was an amazing part of staff back in the day!

I may not be a mod or whatever but I 100% AGREEEEEE with this Finally you was gone before NOW YOUR BACK YES!
You will 100% make a good moderator i hope for admin too!
+Support to the max

Good things
- very friendly
-follows rules exactly
-report rule-breakers
-wasn't in one F1 who he breaked the rules (A F1 that i handeld)
-realy nice application
-you explain exactly why you should be choosen

Bad things
-aren't a moderator

What you must/can change
-be a moderator

Result
Also you get totaly +Support from me!

Great guy! Has the potential of being a moderator again!

+Support!

Good Things:
Looks like you spent a long time preparing the application
You were a staff on Zarp Darkrp before
Lots of time played on servers

Negative:
Nothing Really

My Opinion:
100%+Support from me.

EDIT: Post edited

-support

Didn't apply for admin.

I havent see Nameful disrespecting anyone for long time now. In my honest opinion he deserve second chance as many of our users had.

I will go with + SUPPORT.

I read your app and I have to say I was impressed. You have about 300 hours on the servers, you answered all the questions correctly and you know how to handle Mod situations. Here is what I think:

Good things about you:
-Time on the server.
-Your dedication to the server.
-Your a good guy.
-You were a moderator on zarp before. ( I found out from the comments )
Bad things about you:
-You sometimes act younger than your age, ( no offense ) which could cause you to rage in some situations but I'm sure you can work on that.

Summary: I think you deserve moderator so I'll give you a + Support. Good luck next week, I'm sure you get moderator!

Great person sure you will be a great moderator so
+support
Good Luck

I think that you're ready to become a moderator now, you were one previously so you know how to handle things , and you haven't disrespected in a while, so +SUPPORT!!

Bumping the app, it went very far away.

Good player in game, reports rulebreakers, and follows the rules.

Can be a Bit Trolly On Teamspeak.

+Support

Bumping the app for the last time before the meeting.

First and foremost, we'd like to thank you for making the effort to apply for a rank on the ZARP Semi Serious DarkRP. Your application has been discussed at an administrative meeting, and from there it has been voted on.


Unfortunately as more staff members voted 'no' than 'yes', the application has been denied.

However, the meeting host has taken some criticisms made by the admins and provided you with this feedback:

You are welcome to apply again at any point.