TOPIC: [SSRP Moderator] illuminatixs's reapply

None SSRP related information

RP Name
illuminatixs

Link to Steam Profile
http://steamcommunity.com/id/illuminatixs/

SteamID
STEAM_0:1:62703687

Current Gametracker Profile
http://www.gametracker.com/player/illuminatixs/94.23.19.200:27015/

Age
I'm currently 18 years old.

Estimated Server Time
I'm currently on about 208 hours of in-game experience,
refer to my gametracker for the source.

Languages I speak
I speak Dutch fluently because this is my native language,
and I also speak English almost fluently since its my second language.

----xxx----

DarkRP Related

Explain "Random Death Match" and give an example scenario.

• Explanation:
• Random Death Match or the most used term "RDM" is killing another player with only intention to kill him/her because you felt like it, or just because you dislike the player.


• Example scenario:
• Player 1 walks up to player 2 and he kills player 2 because he doesn't like player 2.

Explain "New Life Rule" and give an example scenario.

• Explanation:
• New Life Rule or NLR as it is most used in-game, will be active after you've been killed or you've killed yourself. You can't return to the place of your death within the NLR time, which is located at the top of the screen and you have to act like you don't remember anything from your life before your death.


• Example scenario:
• Player 1 has been killed by player 2 in his base and after player 1 respawns he immediately walks back to his base and enters it. He is now breaking NLR, since his NLR timer is still active.

Explain "Metagaming" and give an example scenario.

• Explanation:
• Metagamining is one of the more easy rules and yet about the most broken rules in darkRP, it forbids players to speak in the OOC (out of character) chat about IC (in character) related things.


• Example scenario:
• Player 1 and player 2 are basing and player 2 goes to spawn real quick while player 1 stays in the base, player 3 is raiding the base of player 1 and player 2 while player 2 is gone and player 1 sends in out of character chat (/ooc) to player 2 that the base is being raided and that he has to return to help.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for RDMing him, the console log shows that player y killed player x.
I would ask player x if he can tell me his side of the story and then ask if he has any screenshots related to the current situation that could proof the event as he claims it happend, if he does I'd let player x upload his proof and while player x is uploading his proof I'd ask player y for his side of the story, and ask him if he has any proof of the event as he claims it to be, if so I'd let player y upload his proof while I check out player x's uploaded proof and upon return of player y with his proof I'd take correct actions according to the proof and the quality of the proof i receive from both of them.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for breaking NLR, the kills are pretty close together in console (a few lines apart) at a peak time
I'd directly look at the print_nlr in the console and see if player y is in that log, then go to player x to ask what happend while I teleport player x to us, after player x told me his side of the story I'd confront with the fact he was in the print_nlr and ask for his side of the story to make the picture as complete as possible, after player y is done telling his side of the story I'd hold the story of player y next to the story of player x and take correct action upon player y.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x calls for help in the OOC chat because his bank is being raided
If player x wasn't verbally warned before by a staffmember I'd say in the OOC chat he shouldn't be using OOC chat for IC related subjects and leave it with the verbal warning, if player x was verbally warned before I'd explain in OOC chat he shouldn't be using the OOC chat for IC related subjects as he was told and give him a official warning.

Why I should be chosen (longer answer expected here - at least 150 words).
I'm a experienced and respected ex-administrator and I think I've proven my skills on the job,
after a break of a month from Zarp I think I'm full of energy again to start doing what I love again and that is helping the community out and create a better Zarp for us all to enjoy.

To proof my earlier stated line "I'm a experienced and respected ex-administrator" I'd like to quote some lines from my resignation post:

Nameful wrote:
Snupe wrote:
Xhantium wrote:
xXDann_The_WarriorXx wrote:
TiGzTeR wrote:
The feedback supports my earlier mentioned claim, and even one of the community managers responded with kind words and an overall overview of me that supports my claim, and based upon all of this I think I should be a good choice for the moderator position.

Thank you for your time.

I'll go with a -support, I do not know you yet and I haven't seen you that active so far.
I do think its early enough to apply as you just returned to the community, however good luck on your application.
Regards, ZuaXX.

ZuaXX wrote:
I took a break of ~1 month from zarp and I returned,
I think the overall community didn't change too much in 1 month for me to wait out my application.

Also I don't think you read my application, and think you should before actually give a support reaction, since it took you 2 min after me posting this topic to reply.

But thanks for the feedback, and hope to see you soon in-game.

Definately great ex-admin, deserve second chance. ZuaXX Dont base on your own experience, everything wrote in last section is true. You should change it to neutral at least.

+ SUPPORT

Regards,
Twix Palpatine

Active, used to be a great admin, active on teamspeak and a friendly guy.

+Support

Bump for more feedback

I especially liked how you'd listed what other people thought of you from your resignation - definitely a +Support from me!

Active, understands and obeys rules, friendly and helpful.

I will go with +SUPPORT!

TwixPalpatine wrote: What???

Im fairly certain he can have his own opinion, just as you can have yours. You really shouldn't go around telling people there opinion is invalid. When affter all thats what an opinion is THIERS.

SegataSam wrote:
It showed some unique honest insights in what people actually thought of me,
and I think it supports my claim very well so.. why not.

Good to read that you liked it!
And thanks for your feedback!