TOPIC: [SSRP MODERATOR] Agent 47 application

RP Name: Agent 47
Link to Steam Profile: steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198084531640/
SteamID: STEAM_0:0:62132956


Age: 14.15 in april. So close!!!
Estimated Server Time: 44.24 Hours
I have played with 3 different names
1. Al Awesome Naughts 17.67 hours
2. Al Awesome Naughts ©©© 17.72 hours
3. [Z]Al Awesome Naughts 8.87 hours


Languages I speak:
I speak Dutch, Persia, English a little bit German and a little bit French


DarkRP Related


all the useful information, is underlined
Explain "Random Death Match" and give an example scenario.
RDM for short. That means you didn't have a legit/valid reason to kill someone. Mic spammer/he's annoying etc. Aren't valid reason's!!!
My first example:
X is a citizen. X hates Y. So X ran towards Y. X grabbed his big gun. And killed Y. Then Y said in ooc. Admin to me, I got rdm'ed!!!
So X thought. **** ban hammer is coming up. So X killed everyone who he sees with the reason. **** it
What rule did X broke? And what did Y broke?
X broke.
1. RDM
2. And big gun as a citizen
Y broke.
Calling admin through ooc. Y should use f1.

Explain "New Life Rule" and give an example scenario.
New life rule. NLR for short. That means 2 things.
It means that you can't remember anything that happened in the past
It also means that you can't come back at the area you died, within 3 minutes.
My first example:
T is raiding the base O. O has alot of printers inside. T managed to kill O. O thought. No ***** way that he will ever get my printers.
So O ran to his base again. Killed T and rp'ed further.
So what rule did O broke? Well he broke 1 rule
Simply NLR. Which of the two? The 3 minutes time NLR.

My second example
J is a hitman. J sees a bounty on the player X. X was going to his base, to receive money from his printer.
J killed X. X says: You ******* ****. I will get you!!!. So he ran to his base. Equipped a gun and shot J.
So what rule did X broke? Well he broke 2 rules.
1. He broke NLR. Which of the two? The 3 minutes time NLR
2. He insulted!

Explain "Metagaming" and give an example scenario.
Metagaming. Metagaming means that your telling IC information through OOC. This is a way of "abuse" and it's a common rule that user's break!

My first example: P say's in advert. Raid. Then O sees him. O think's. hey it's that ******. haha this will be fun. So he said in OOC.
haha M he is raiding you!!! hahahahahaha. So M ran to his base. And killed P.
So what rule did O broke?
Well he used IC info. Through OOC. Which is metagaming.

My second example: K see's that G is mugging someone. K says in OOC. CP come G is mugging someone!
So K had an cage in his advanced duplicator. He opens it and traps G in it. He waited until a cp came and then he would remove it!
So a cp finally came and arrest G. So what rule did K broke?
Well he broke 2 rules
1. Making a "cage" and block someone. Also known as Propblock
2. Metagaming!


Here are the command's I use, underlined

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for RDMing him, the console log shows that player y killed player x.
I would first goto the roof. Why? Simply because of the privacy. Besides, if X told that he got rdm'ed trough ooc or trough ///. I would ignore it. I would answer only through f1. So when I am at the roof with X, I would bring player Y. If any of them walks away. I would freeze them and tell them not to go away. This is just a verbal warning. Then I would unfreeze him. If he walks away again, I would warn him. Then bring him + freeze him. Then I would hear why Y killed X. If Y doesn't response, I would first verbal warn him. After that, I would warn him. Then listen to X his story. Then ask for any proof. If he doesn't have proof. I wouldn't handle anything. So then watch the proof.
When I am watching the proof, it needs to include:
1. Proof that Y actually shot X
2. Proof that it was Y not anyone else
Then warn Y for RDM(if the proof was ok). And asked them where they were. Bring them back and response the next f1's!!!

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for breaking NLR, the kills are pretty close together in console (a few lines apart) at a peak time.
I would first goto the roof. Why? Simply because of the privacy. Besides, if X told that Y broke nlr trough ooc or trough ///. I would ignore it. I would answer only through f1. So when I am at the roof with X, I would bring player Y. If any of them walks away. I would freeze them and tell them not to go away. This is just a verbal warning. Then I would unfreeze him. If he walks away again, I would warn him. Then bring him + freeze him. Then I would hear why Y broke nlr. If Y doesn't response, I would first verbal warn him. After that, I would warn him. Then ask where player X killed player Y. If he says. At spawn. I would tell X that everywhere except spawn, is acceptable. Then ask for proof.
When I am watching the proof, it needs to include:
1. See if it actually is Y
Then warn Y for NLR(if the proof was ok). And asked them where they were. Bring them back and response the next f1's!!!

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x calls for help in the OOC chat because his bank is being raided
First I would goto to him. Tell him that he can't tell trough OOC his IC information. Ask him, if he understands metagaming.
If he doesn't I would ask him to check !motd or !rules. Tell him if he needs anything else and response the next f1's!
But if he still's says it OOC, that his bank is being raided. I would warn him. Goto to him and ask if he actually read the !motd/!rules
Then still tell him that he is free to ask me anything, anytime.
Next time it would be a kick.

Why I should be chosen (longer answer expected here - at least 150 words).
I think I should be chosen, because of these follow reasons!
- I am behaving better then I was in the past. I don't break rules.
- I also have knowledge of the rules. I have read motd 2 times now.
- Because of my admin experience, I also have knowledge of the commands
- I am more active, my test are over now. So I am more active!
- I don't RP that much anymore. I am more looking for the rule breakers. I always have my fraps on. Just in case something happens.
- I am more trustable.
- When I get accepted, you will probably see me more as MoD then as a other RPjob.
- I am have respect for other players. I am not disrespectful if they ask for help
- I am not a rage
- I want to help the community
- And of course, get rid of the rule breakers

I made an apply but it got denied.
The reason why:
- immature
-misconduct at TS
Which one did I approved? And how did I improve?
- I behave better
- I behave at the TS server now!

Thanks for reading,
And vote fair!

Your application has been discussed at an administrative meeting, and from there it has been voted on. Here's a pie chart which contains the votes you received:

Many complained of sexual content being given on teamspeak as well as immaturity and lack of patience.