TOPIC: DENIED ChrisTheBoss Moderator Application.

Read the posts in this thread before giving support or lack thereof.

Real name:
Chris
Country:
America

Age:
15

Total Playtime Ingame:
956 Hours on Gmod. On Zarp since before the SRP merger.

In-Game & Username & Steam ID & Steam Nickname:
In-Game - [_)AoH(_] ChrisTheBoss
Username - [_)AoH(_] ChrisTheBoss
SteamID

Sorry ive had a few problems with you and its a weak app

We need a more specifik gametime on ZARP not total on Garrys mod.

It says ''Give 1 Example''
add that aswell. If it says give 1 example you should give us 1 example.

Would you warn the person all the time? would you never kick? or? Be MORE specifik pleae.


I will give -Support there are some lacks in this application.

Zeroxjeppe wrote:
I don' have the exact number, but I've been playing here since before it was named ZARP, since the days of SRP.

I did give you one example for each, read it again. The examples I have given are enough, observe:

"Nlr stands for new life rules. Never go back to the place you died."
That is self-sufficient by itself. If you get killed, you are not allowed to go back to where you just died. It's as simple as it gets. An example? Person A shoots person B at location X,

There is no Super-Admin that looks at Moderator Forums that can accept server 3 applications for some reason, or if there is they just don't.

You might have to wait some time to find out if your declined or accepted.

Would like some more people to give their opinion first

MrFart wrote:
Could you give a guess how many hours on Zarp?
MrFart wrote: Are you still active? Also was it on this account, because your steamid only shows one other community and on that one your rank was Newbie.
MrFart wrote: Nlr isn't fully explained, also you shall give an example. Lack of effort.
MrFart wrote: Is that the only thing you would do? If not, then why haven't you explained more.

I'm gonna give you a -Support, mostly because I have seen you cause some trouble ingame. (No Proof)

Since it was named Zarp? It's always been named Zarp pal.

[size=360:32vjmmcc]Read the posts in this thread before giving support or lack thereof.
[/size]
Guffe wrote:
Explained in my previous post. If you want to properly give support negatively or positively then actually do bother to read what has been said. You actually come off as quiet rude in your lack of effort in actually reading what's going on and instead give a -support based on nothing but mere assumptions that have already been answered previously. Here, I'll help you, the post was two posts above yours: http://zarpgaming.com/http://zarpgaming ... 862#p18862

Read it please before giving out half-though judgments. You see, this is one of the reasons why I would like to be a moderator here, I actually care enough to read every post and take matters into as much of an objective form as I can. I would request that you at least do the same in reciprocal fashion.

The gmod servers are:
- ThreeDogsServer: Admin
- PSI DarkRP: Moderator
- AMM DarkRP: Admin

And some other minor servers.

Lack of effort? That is as concise and to the point as required. Details are not by any means necessary when they are not necessary. Nevertheless, had you actually followed your criticism and done away with "lack of effort" then you would realize that I already put enough effort to explain, at length, this issue and all others in my previous post which can, again, be found here: http://zarpgaming.com/http://zarpgaming ... 862#p18862

See above.

Cause some trouble? And you say you have no proof as well? Essentially you claim that I cause trouble, do not read my posts, do not read context, and give me a -support based on nothing but both assumptions and falsities? Yes, assumptions as in the case of above with the accusation lacking proof and falsities as in the case of you not bothering to read my post and claim that I did not explain, not put in any effort, and whatnot.

Listen, if you want to receive respect then you need to firstly give out respect to others, especially if you are mistaken, have not put any effort in actually reading what they say, and when you represent a position of officialdom.
Lord Blast wrote:
The SRP community merged with the Zarp community.
See the context:
http://zarpgaming.com/http://zarpgaming ... 8922#p8922
http://zarpgaming.com/http://zarpgaming ... 9064#p9064
Etc.

Chris I did read the replies before making my reply, but it doesn't change my opinion. The application has some minor mistakes that I pointed out, but what really made the difference was the last part I wrote.
This isn't a ban request, proof isn't needed. I'm keeping my -.

You should just listen to your supports and be glad that they used time to read it and make a comment.

No examples of RDM or NLR, those are easy questions so no excuse -Support

MrFart wrote:
Stop fussing, the more you fuss the less chance you have of becoming a moderator. Just be thankful for your +supports and take your -supports as good criticism!

[size=360:7pehpxpb]-SUPPORT[/size]
Doesn't seem like moderator material because you just fuss to much about things and you have a lack of stuff about the rules.

Prophet wrote:
I already gave examples of RDM and NLR. Seriously, read posts before replying. See specifically this post here where I go in depth to explain them with enough examples: http://zarpgaming.com/http://zarpgaming ... 826#p18826

[quote=[USS] ITookYourTaco]
[size=360:3owlmj79]-SUPPORT[/size]
Doesn't seem like moderator material because you just fuss to much about things and you have a lack of stuff about the rules.
[/quote]

Very well, you do not wish that I be a moderator then I will not waste my effort doing so. I assure you, I would have been a pretty good moderator as I have enough past experience and willingness to be one. Oh and by the way, fussing is essential, especially when your "judges" do not even bother to read the material you present them and instead slap you in the face with a negative support out of sheer apathy rather than attentive examination and analysis of one's words. Fussing must be encourage and not criticized when it is justifiable. Fussing when individuals repeat the same thing over and over again when it has already been answered (as in the case of example) is completely justified. Oh and what do you mean "you have a luck of stuff about the rules"? That I did not go at length to speak of the rules? I did do so in the second post. In fact, my application, when compared to certain others that were accepted, goes at much length to explain everything. Go look at the other applications that were accepted that did not even give examples.

You know what? So be it. I shall not be a moderator. Is it because of anything lacking on my part? Not by any means. Is it due to anything lacking on others' part? Yes indeed. If those that were to give out support, negative or otherwise, had read the posts in the thread and seen that:
1) I have already given enough examples and explained the reasoning behind them.
2) I fussed for justified reasons - individuals failing to read the posts in this thread before posting themselves about something that has already been discussed at length.
3) There is a difference between negative support and good criticism. When posters come here, do not read anything in this thread except the OP, copy others concerning the issues and then say "-support, no explanation" when I have already went into that matter and addressed the issue in the second post, that is not constructive nor good criticism but merely negative and counter-productive criticism that only comes about from bias or ignorance.

Oh and yes, I'm actually good moderator material. If your argument to the contrary hinges on the fact that you did not bother to read anything in this thread concerning the examples given or the reasons for the fuss then I sincerely wonder how YOU became a moderator. If I were to be a moderator, I would hold every issue in an objective matter, not caring about nonspecific issues that are a non-issue in the first place and instead actually take the time to delve into the matter before giving my judgement. When justice needs to be dealt, I do not care who the person is or what position he has, I care about the matter at hand and his actions. I do not brown nose, I treat everything objectively just as I do now. That is why I am good moderator material and that is why I have in the past become an administrator on multiple servers and on multiple games.

You based your entire assertion that I am "no good moderator material" purely on the basis of me replying to others who have entirely ignored everything in this thread and gave out their judgement based on nothing. If anything what I reply with is

MrFart wrote:
I did read the post, not the comments about you crying when you get a -S, next time put it in the app and not in a comment. My -support will remain as it is.

Prophet wrote: He only read the OP... Sigh...

And that is why, people, you need to read context before judging a case. You only read the initial post without bothering to read the later discussion on the matter, what you called crying is actually an emphasis on the original post that is crucial for any application. Read the "crying" before judging next time. That is what an admin/moderator must do. If you fail that then I do not wish to join your ranks.

So I say let your -support remain! If you do not bother to read context and analyze each case then I do not wish to beg for your change of opinion!

MrFart wrote:
ffs you could have just modified the post, and tdh I don't care if you become mod or not since I have never seen you in game and I probably never will as I hardly go on server 3. I am giving my opinion based on what is in your app and your attitude toward me and other members of the community.

Prophet wrote: App is now modified. If you do not care to read past that now you don't even need to. My attitude is completely in response to people who do not respect others nor care enough to read anything past the OP no matter the importance of it before giving their judgement. If I had done something wrong, been actually lacking, etc. and you gave me a -support, I would not by any means complain, but when someone says that it's lacking, there's no explanation, etc. when everything is explained in the discussion after the OP then there is nothing to be said to such an individual other than what has been said already.

I dont remember ive ever seen you on ZARP, and you wrote you played GM a lot.
-supoort