TOPIC: [SSRP Moderator] BlueCider's Application

RP Name: BlueCider
Time Zone: GMT
Link to Steam Profile: steamcommunity.com/id/diamrald/
SteamID: STEAM_0:0:93784857
Current Gametracker Profiles:
Server 1 - www.gametracker.com/player/BlueCider/dar...arpgaming.com:27015/
Server 3 (USA) - www.gametracker.com/player/BlueCider/usa.zarpgaming.com:27015/

I will build hours up and will have a consistent playtime by the end of this week

Estimated Server Time: 320 Hours

Languages I speak: English and German

Explain "Random Death Match" and give an example scenario:

Random deathmatch or RDM is an event of a player killing another player without a valid reason. An example of this would be; John kills Ben for no reason. This would be a punishable event and would end up John getting warned for his actions.

Explain "New Life Rule" and give an example scenario:

New Life Rule (AKA NLR) is a rule where a player cannot return to the place/area of death within a set time. This rule is set to prevent people from constantly re-spawning after death and raiding the same place repeatedly. If a player returns to the area of their death while the timer is still counting down, they will be breaking NLR, therefore, breaking the rules which can result in a punishment.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
You are handling a report in which player A accuses player B of killing them for no reason in a report via the F1 system.

I would first ask both parties for their sides of the story in order to get an idea of the situation.

I would then request proof of the RDM from player A and review the proof to confirm it was RDM. If player A cannot produce any evidence of the RDM, the sit would be ended and no one would be punished.

However, if player B decides to call himself out, I would proceed to punish player B accordingly.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
You witness a user mass RDMing in spawn, killing many people constantly to the point where users are complaining.

Due to the fact I wouldn't have permission to ban this user, I would freeze/jail/kick the user until someone with elevated permissions can ban the user for MRDM.


Why I should be chosen (we recommend a minimum of around 150 words):

I think I should be chosen to become a moderator because I have had past experience as an administrator and I really enjoyed it. Within the time of being an administrator, I had proven myself to be a resilient and reliable staff member of the Zarp community and would love to join it again with higher hopes.

Thanks for reading my application,

BlueCider

It clearly states that you need two weeks of consistent activity, Whereas I've only seen you on today to my knowledge.

As I said, I will build up one week of good high activity and a clean rap sheet.

Sam Winchester wrote:
Also, it does not state I need 2 weeks but is rather recommended.

I'd personally recommend more than just one week.

good luck on meeting day nonetheless

BlueCider wrote:
I've been denied on multiple occasions for that exact reason, It just gives them one less reason or one more reason to deny or accept you aswell.

You are a great dude, and were, without a doubt, a great admin - Though that activity is the only thing standing in-between you and the staff team, make sure to keep it high and consistent, and you will have mu vote. Good luck mate!

You've been staff before so I'm sure you know what to do in different types of scenarios. The only thing that stands against you is your activity. However, you did say that you will build up your activity by the meeting and will keep a clear rap sheet. That shows your determination more than anything else so . The only thing i would say would be that you need to make sure to get your activity up! I'm sure you would be a good asset to the staff team so it would be a shame if that's what you were denied for!

Activity is a bit low but I'm sure you can build that up, I don't know if I've seen you in game but good luck anyway!

Sam Winchester wrote: It isn't a requirement but it is however highly recommended. Even if 2 weeks isn't needed, your activity is very low and even if you play consistently until the meeting you'll only have about 6 days played. That is quite low but you can make up for it with high numbers so we'll have to wait and see.

Just like the others, You need to have at least consistent activity so that you can get a feel for the server and know the rules, from checking your gametracker it looks like you've just joined and applied straight away.

From what I've read you were a good admin in the past and you have no recents but even if you play every day untill the meeting you will still only have less than a week of activity and of course while 2 weeks is only reccomended Ive seen ex LT get denied with 10 days of activity.

I would say wait another week to relearn all the rules and catch up with the new rules since I don't know how long it was since you were staff, untill then