RP Name: Gody
Time Zone: GMT + 1
Link to Steam Profile: My Steam Profile
SteamID: STEAM_0:0:169364998
Current Gametracker Profiles:
Server 1 -
www.gametracker.com/player/GODY/darkrp.zarpgaming.com:27015/
Server 3 -
www.gametracker.com/player/Gody/usa.zarpgaming.com:27015/
Estimated Server Time: Over 370+
Languages I speak: English & German
Explain "Random Death Match" and give an example scenario:
Random Death Match (or short "RDM") is the act of fighting other players without any valid roleplay - reason.
This includes crossfire.
RDM Example: A wanted person kills a cop who is AFK in spawn.
The player had no reason to kill the officer, as there was no attempt to arrest him at that point in time.
Thus RDM.
Not RDM Example: A thief is lockpicking the door of a Gun Dealer, who then continues to shoot at the thief.
Lockpicking his door was clearly a valid reason to shoot/kill the player.
Explain "New Life Rule" and give an example scenario:
The New Life Rule (or short "NLR") restricts players from going back to their district of death for 3 minutes.
They also have to act as if they forgot everything from their past life.
NLR Example: An gangster was killed in his base during a raid. After dying he instantly runs back to his basement and tries to fight the raiders.
Not NLR Example: An officer was killed while trying to defend the Police Department, after respawning he returns to the PD.
PD raids are an exception to the NLR Rule, thus the officer did not break the NLR Rule.
Explain how you would handle the following situation:
You are handling a report in which player A accuses player B of killing them for no reason in a report via the F1 system.
After approaching the reporter to ask him for proof / his side of the story, I would try to get both players to a roof so I can also listen to the reporters' view on the situation. I would then ask the reporter for proof and make sure to validate everyone's story using logs. Using logs, the proof, and everyone's story I judge whether RDM occurred or not if the reported player did indeed RDM I'd take a look at his rap sheet to get further information on how to punish the player. I would also make sure there aren't any open questions on both sides and then explain the broken rule to the reported player (unless he clearly knows, eg. many warns for RDM already). If the proof isn't substantial enough, or the reporters' story contradicts with it, I would have to finish the sit after asking whether anyone needs further help with something. It is important to explain why I have to end the sit.
Explain how you would handle the following situation:
You witness a user mass RDMing in spawn, killing many people constantly to the point where users are complaining.
I would begin with freezing said, mass RDMing user and ask him why he did it. Either way, I would warn the user for Mass RDM, and allow him to go but with keeping an eye on him, if he begins to mass RDM again I would kick him from the server, if the user returns again and begins to mass RDM again I would ask an admin to ban the user for his actions, whilst keeping him frozen if he leaves I will have the users Steam ID in case of this.
Why I should be chosen:
So after coming back after a while of being gone, I have decided to start being active once again. Previously I have been both Moderator and Administrator on SSRP, but as lots of us know the Administrator part wasn't the best, which is why I am going from fresh with moderator to build up the staff teams trust. I am trying to make reports as much as possible and trying to help people out. Recently I've become very dedicated to activity and just being around on the server and not being AFK as many people may see, I spend a lot of time on S3. I think I am capable of getting moderator again with many factors as to why, but with the things above as a few. Along with previously being staff I was always doing F1's and helping as quickly and as swift as possible. Also I am on at times where little to no staff at all are on due to my sleep schedule/body clock and from many recent experiences it has shown that staff is needed at those times where there is none. any constructive feedback is appreciated, thank you.