TOPIC: [SSRP Moderater] ItsFuckingKato / TTT player

RP Name: ItsFuckingKato / TTT player

Time Zone: Pacific Standard Time

Link to Steam Profile: steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198348950106/

Steam ID: STEAM_0:0:194342189

Game Tracker Profiles:
www.gametracker.com/player/Kato/darkrp.zarpgaming.com:27015/
www.gametracker.com/player/James/darkrp.zarpgaming.com:27015/
(PS : Gametracker might be busted from what i read so IDK if their accurate)

Estimated Server Time: 500+ Hours

Languages I speak: English

Random Death Match Explanation and Scenario: Random Death Match or 'RDM' is when player 'x' kills player 'y' for no valid reason, only to kill them for the fun of it. An example of RDM is if player 'x' was to kill player 'y' soley for the reason that player 'y' was someone he didn't personally like.

New Life Rule Explanation and Scenario: New Life Rule or 'NLR' is a rule that makes it so If a player is killed in a certain district they are not allowed to go there and continue their past life for a few minutes. An example of someone breaking this NLR rule is if player 'x' is raided and killed by player 'y', then player 'x' returns to his base and kills player 'y' 30 seconds after he was first killed.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for RDMing him, the console log shows that player y killed player x.
If I were to handle this situation the first thing I would do is to ask them each their side of the story (Most likely separately at first to see if there stories are the same or not) , if player 'y' admits to RDMing player 'x' then they would be warned, if he didn't admit to RDMing or had a valid reason to kill player 'x' I would then ask if player 'x' had any evidence of this. If not then there wouldn't be anything I could do about the situation seeing as one of them could be lying.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for breaking NLR, the kills are pretty close together in console (a few lines apart) at a peak time.
I would first ask player 'x' what exactly happened and with player 'y' then I would ask player 'y' why player 'x' killed them. If player 'y's reason for being killed the second time was because they broke NLR I would punish them. If player 'y' didn't admit to breaking NLR then I would ask player 'x' if they had any proof of this, if not I wouldn't be able to punish player 'y'

Why I should be chosen: Recently I've really been enjoying playing on SSRP but their have been a lot of RDMers online while staff either aren't or are AFK so me and my friends just have to accept the fact and not be able to play. I would really like being able to help the SSRP community so that more players are able to have fun and RP while not having to be worried that they'll be RDMed and lose their valuable items. I would enjoy to be able to better help out on the server and help enforce the rules.

Thank you for reading this;

Sincerely, Kato

Has been a staff member on SSRP in the past and is currently an admin on bhop. I believe Kato can be trusted in this position, given that he has also been a staff member on TTT and did a great job. Also has a good attitude in game and is pretty active.

Henny wrote:

thanks man, really appreciate the kind words

Dr. Richard wrote: I urge you to reconsider.

dingofetch wrote:
Well, he think being AFK as a cop is allowed, after the CM Team and Chute said it isn't. Then he engaged in an argument where he showed his poor attitude. This just shows that he would be awful when needed to listen to higher-up's, and that he needs to go trough the SSRP rules and also fix his attitude ASAP.

I'm not reconsidering anything...

Dr. Richard wrote: I thought AFKing as cop and stuff like that was only against the rules if you weren't chill with the staff

you are always super chill to me and always nice, maybe brush up on a few things
also is super active!

Weren’t you demoted or something last time you were staff?

OnionRings wrote:
Forgot to post on forums about my inactivity and was demoted, now I know to post about it to give people a heads up

OH GOD OH FUCK

Dr. Richard wrote:
I don't think AFKing on cop is allowed, I was just confused about the circumstances that's all, and I didn't argue with the LT. I simply said what I thought about it and agreed with their points

Good luck man

Kato_ wrote:
AFK is only not allowed for the duration of the PD update, with 25x, 50x, and 100x paychecks. A lot of people afk as FBI once they get the 100x to get 37.5k (yea i do it too). Correct me if im wrong, but AFK cop wont be punishable once the PD update has gone.

conor.martin838 wrote:
Wrong. Jobs have slot limits, so by being AFK (or better put, not fulfilling the job role), you can be demoted as someone else who may actually make use of the slot can take it. A good example is for AFK miners who have died one way or another and are 'mining' in spawn, they can be demoted as they aren't technically doing the job but are still taking up a job slot.

.uzi wrote: But in the case of FBI and other VIP only jobs, there are no job limits. so maybe being AFK in a vip job?

I don't think I explained it clear enough, oops. Yes, VIPs jobs do not have slot limits but you can still be demoted for not doing the job, like being AFK or ignoring criminals (which is really corruption and would be breaking job rules).

es un hombre. he is very nice person however i am very concerned for his knowledge of the rules.