TOPIC: [SSRP Super Admin] Ezehzz Application!

4 Hours for this shit btw.

not comfortable with the idea of this whatsoever, exploited bank vault multiple times within the past month or so, to complete bank raids in around 2 minutes and get easy money + ignored his friends' rulebreaks, there was something else recently which i've forgotten about, on top of that decided to trash me in two appeals where he deemed my bans invalid.

also attempted to slate me on my resignation thread because of a pure grudge and was unable to form a legitimate argument against me.

generally always targeted me (which actually played a large role in my resignation) even after I personally and privately approached him and apologised sincerely for a few of my actions towards him, showing that he's not willing to get over his personal issues and from that I don't really see you ever being a suitable candidate.

tl;dr: no

no thanks

sorIe wrote:
We did not exploit it. We started the bank raid and then it ended after a couple of minutes. After that we started it again just to see if it was a bug but we got it again, then I tried to contact several Lead Team members but no one was active, then I talked to Deadmonstor and explained what happened. I was randomly at spawn and somehow successfully raided the bank raid without me raiding it.

Regarding your resignation and your attitude, your attitude on the servers have been disappointing and I did not call your bans invalid, I called them excessive because you banning James for a week is just way too harsh and I already talked to you about it.
have also not ignored any of my friends rulebreaks, I have if they rdm me etc but I have not ignored them if they ruined others roleplay on the servers.

One of the worse candidates in a long time but big up for the profile picture

Gatis Kandis wrote:

Let's go through this response:

Ezehzz wrote:
okay, so you acknowledge that it was bugged, however you still repeatedly used it. You acknowledging it whilst abusing it, saying "why isn't this shit over" 2 minutes into the bank raid:



Ezehzz wrote:
Well you clearly didn't contact the two lead team members that were CLEARLY ON THE SERVER and weren't undercover at the time, as demonstrated by the video.

"You started it again just to see if it was a bug" you did it about 5 times, PERFECTLY ACKNOWLEDGING EACH TIME that you were abusing it.

Ezehzz wrote:
What, is this the same childish argument that Skeleton got blasted for because it was FALSE? You formed opinions immediately because you didn't know the entire situation, and you're STILL sticking with the same flimsy arguments after you heard multiple people INCLUDING A COMMUNITY MANAGER say it was bullshit on Teamspeak yesterday. I don't know dude, seems to me like a sort of personal bias, which you should NOT present as a lead team candidate, ESPECIALLY affter having your arguments dismissed due to how simply ridiculous they were.

Ezehzz wrote:
What, so you threatening that I'll have action taken on me for a perfectly valid permanent ban isn't calling it invalid? Surely if it was invalid, Raeker would've overruled the punishment entirely when he looked at the appeal? Or any of the MULTIPLE HAs who I know viewed the appeal? Not a single person except YOU has raised a concern for the punishment, considering Semm's past of generally minging.

Moving on to James Stone's ban, it was honestly quite funny how excessively biased you were against me, because all you saw was "0 recent punishments" when in reality there's a lot more to it which you failed to listen to. During the Steam chat, you attempted to consistently overwhelm me with multiple questions at once whilst I was attempting to speak with James, showing an inability to handle situations correctly and an unwillingness to change mindset. The last thing we need in the lead team is overly stubborn people. You deem the ban "excessive" (realistically you deemed it immediately invalid) due to the fact that he had 0 recent punishments, however I was in a channel with a Super Admin at the time who completely stood by the ban, on top of the fact that he even told me during the sit that he had no intentions of changing his poor attitude.

Oh by the way, doesn't this quote taken directly from the verdict on James' appeal showcase you essentially calling my ban invalid, completely voiding your earlier point?

Ezehzz wrote:
Moving swiftly on:

Ezehzz wrote:
Doesn't the video above showcase a rather different story? Two Super Admins (one is no longer staff) witnessed you at the time allowing one of your friends to break NLR and another to propblock themselves in a cooling tower to ensure the bank raid win, and the NLR is pretty clear in the video (if it's the right one I posted, I've got a lot of that situation).

Not even going to get on to your past of constantly hacking on the servers and doing other sketchy shit.

At the end of the day, your blatantly dishonest arguments against me prove my point even more that you're not suitable for this position.

Nah you have a shitty attitude towards sorle so for me aswell

Also dont try to spec me ALL DAY I know what you're doing

lisph

sorIe wrote:
That's right Sorley DO 'EM DIRTY

sorIe wrote:
yikes

sorIe wrote:

When we raided the bank, there was a lot of us in there, running in and out. I did not pay any attention at all if they NLR'd or not because I was focused on defending ourselves. They did paste a dupe and I told them to delete it instantly.
And during that time, I did in fact contact LT in admin chat. I really did.

About you, me and James, I did not go against you. I was pointing out that You shouldn't have banned him for such a long time. I told you that a mute could've easily solved the situation and if he continues to do what he did, then he'd get further punishments.

About me reducing Semm's ban, I have not experienced any problems with him since I got staff and from 3day ban to a perma is just way too excessive. Like.. What did he do to be a minge rather than proppushing that car? You told him thar you'd perma ban him if he said one word... (as far as im aware of).

---

Luna wrote:
I have not spectated you once during my time as staff recently, just letting you know. Also how is my attitude shitty?

good luck

Ezehzz wrote:
1. can be accepted - I never saw you attempt to contact any LT in admin chat though and neither did the other LT members.

2. I DEFINITELY should've. If you take so much issue with the ban, take it up with a LT member, I'll speak to them, and we'll see if I really shouldn't have banned him for so long.

3. He recently received a 2 week ban from Clarky for this exact reason, and his standing within the community is extremely poor. Why should he NOT receive a permanent ban for doing the EXACT same shit he's been recently banned for multiple times?

The car was enough, as it killed multiple people and he was frequently doing it. I'm not sure where you pulled that last bit out from lmfao, never said anything of the sort.

Once again, the justifications are nonsense. Please stop making a fool of yourself and just leave it at that at this point, for your own sake.

Ezehzz wrote: Search for yourself at Sorle resignation
And you are targeting a staff member that is x2 better then you, you said youre disappoint cuz he didn't deal with rules breaker,what about yourself ?
God you remind me of asher not gonna lie also I know after I unsupport me I know you will hunt me down like you use to

Luna wrote:
I've never been hunting you down lmfao. And I am not targeting anyone. And I do deal with rulebreakers. He resigned and instead of dealing with them a few minutes before his rank got taken away, he joined them and did nothing.
I'm in on Skeletonwarrior because sorle ignored all the rulebreaks because he "resigned". He still should've dealt with it because he still had his rank, if he wants the respect he wants.

I respect sorle for all the work he has done but still, it made some people disappointed.

Ezehzz wrote: He can decided to deal with rules breaker or not,you can't force someone To deal with rules breaker when they are rping and you respect his work why don't you said something nice instead of said HE STILL HAVE HIS RANK BLAH BLAH BLAH

Ezehzz wrote:
Why should I have to deal with shit when it's no longer my obligation? The only reason I still had the rank was because Skeleton was AFK, meaning I shouldn't have it. I'd lost all motivation to actually be a staff member due to all of my hard work just getting thrown back in my face over the tiniest mistakes or sometimes even over things which weren't actually mistakes at all, and this is a PERFECT example.

And if you legitimately respected the work I'd done instead of just trying to put up an act on your application, you wouldn't start cursing me out in private spacers, would you?

No more arguing, it's like shouting at a brick wall at this point. You're honestly only making yourself look worse man, come on.