TOPIC: [ACCEPTED]aadamftw (megera)

Name - aadamftw(changed to Megera)
STEAM-ID - STEAM_0:0:29167121
Reason - Nlr, rdm, propblock, propspam, building in ot
Story - What happened?
Proof - http://www.ulozto.net/xebt1wS/demo-dem
Server - 46.4.33.27:27015

I just want to say that that's not the Steam ID. Example: STEAM_0:1:1234567
You can find the steam id through a steam id finder.

At school right now, will check the demo when I get home. Neutral for now

He broke NLR yesterday, so I'm gonna go ahead and +support this

+ Support

Did alot of RDM yesterday.

He has been rulebreaking lately and i believe he needs a serious punishment +Support

I will have a look at this when I get home tomorrow but this looks like a definate ban.

Clear proof. He also fading door abused. Will ban him for 1440 mins

If you get me his steam id that is. Will keep this open till then

Veritas, can you take care of this now?, its here like 5 days now >.< http://zarpgaming.com/http://zarpgaming ... ic.php?t=1

Here Is The Guy's Steam ID:STEAM_0:0:29167121

Explain to me why this says accepted even though no one put accted in the chat or locked the thread???

xllgummybearllx wrote: Like he said why is it not locked o.O

Turtle Leader wrote:
I belive he might of just put accepted in the name. (Not accusing, sorry if it sounds like it) i just dont think a Admin/Super Admin would put accepted in the name without locking or puting the ACCEPTED quote at the bottum of a thread.

Gummy If you read Veritas's post He clearly said "Clear proof. He also fading door abused. Will ban him for 1440 mins" and "If you get me his steam id that is. Will keep this open till then"
Please read posts before making comments that can be answered by reading a few posts. I put the steam ID when Veritas Logged off

DoAxKenney1 wrote:
Actualy kenney you are wrong. Veritas is an amazing super admin. i dout he would just leave an application modified saying ACCEPTED without locking it or leaving a comment about accepting it. SSo even if he did say 'Clear Proof' That still doesnt mean he accepted it

He said he will ban him, But he needed his Steam ID. And I never said he was a bad Super Admin. And Veritas Isn't going to lock a Ban request without the guys Steam ID. How is he going to ban him? Think about it bro

DoAxKenney1 wrote:
He never said he would ban him. He only asked for his Steam ID. Your right he does need his ID though. I never said you said he was a bad super admin. i was proving a point saying he wouldnt just leave a appliation open accepted but with no words of saying it was accepted. or locked. Think about it? I belive i have thought about it enough. Dont argue with me.

I said i would ban him. And I did leave it open because Kenney didnt provide the ID. But now its here and he shall recieve his punishment

ACCEPTED