TOPIC: [DR] Warn Request

Name: Foxy
Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:102001921


Server: Deathrun Server 2
Time: 21:20 GMT

I would like this player to be warned for "Exploiting".

Minecraft Exploiting at the beginning
Console Showing

I would also like to say that the death was in the wrong as well, for killing the runner, and such both have "exploited" but Foxy was the one that went up and I clearly said in chat that that was exploiting but he carried on.

I thought I was the only one who found out and tried it. Oh crap, at least I know not to do it know xD

+Support for the warn thing.

Hey, it's his lawyer.
You can't see it's him, you got a picture of someone exploiting without seeing his name, and another picture of the console showing Foxy got murdered.
Invalid proof, case solved.

Thanks, Thezeus.
Protecting the rule breakers since 2012.

Thezeus wrote:

Thezeus wrote:
FAIL.

You just admitted he broke a rule xD

The Gamer Guy wrote:
I can say whatever I want, it doesn't mean it's true.
So not really a fail, there is a point at what I said too, the evidance is invalid.

Thezeus wrote:
So from what i understand from this , if a guy mass disrespects , mass trap spams , hacks , threatens to ddos , you're gonna protect/defend him ?

Kek

The Hitman Jerry wrote:
If the proof is invalid, yes.
Also there is no evidence of Steam ID, how are we supposed to know it's him?

The evidence is actually valid. If you look at the console you will see that it says the round will change in 2 rounds. On deathrun this appears at the start of every round. You then see walrus saying about exploiting and then the guy then dies from a scythe. It would of been too quick for him to of finished the map and killed him.
The screenshot and the console are linking through walrus saying no exploiting so it clearly shows that it is him doing it.
Ill get people to look out for him and if anyone is on when he is on server 2 ill get them to give him a warning for exploiting.

ManyaJayne wrote:
There is no Steam ID proof, how do you know it's not someone with the same name, and that it's actually his steam ID?
There is a reason that you have to bring Steam ID proof in the template, and he just skipped that part simply because he can't prove it's his Steam ID.

Thezeus wrote: This makes you look like complete bullshit.
We can no longer trust if you say if something is true or not. Cause your excuse will be:

ManyaJayne wrote:
Pretty sure thread can be locked now.

khaitam2001 wrote:
I don't care, and obviously if I said he is a rulebreaker the case isn't solved lol.

Thezeus wrote:
Your answer to this thread was pathetic anyway.

"Oh shit guys someone made a joke. Let's all turn on him like a pack of dogs and tear him apart! Go ZARP!"

Thezeus wrote: Thats not even a correct sentence?
Dont know if this is true or not.