TOPIC: Serious Debate about Good Luck

Constructive posting there, non constructive posting elsewhere. What if you take apart the framework and look at the concept again? This phenomenal of posting good luck that has surfaced in late 2016 and has dwindled but still continuing to today.

The product of the selling/buying of SSRP/Points thread is to catch buyers/sellers who are interested in whatever is on offer and either accept or offer their proposal. Yet good luck posts offer no value to these threads, thus are what is deemed non-constructive. Some are even guilty of not even looking at the thread and posting the same old but opposite of what it is after.

I see these "Good Luck" post spams as basically just those people's way to gain more "posts" towards their profiles, I find it to be just another excuse to so called "shitpost" and there probably isn't really any good intention behind it that has anything to do with the actual post or the writer himself.

I'm unsure where you're getting at bud.

Jordz wrote:
Exactly.

Studio Banter wrote:
So what's your aim in this thread?

Jordz wrote:
To fight against your weakness, the ctrl-v.
jk I think you should try reading it again.

Studio Banter wrote:

hahaha this is the best thing i have ever seen

Studio Banter wrote:
You've legit just confused me, Also they're no rule as of now against it.

Fine I'll rephrase it.

Good luck posts are not constructive on selling/buying threads as they don't contribute anything. And I never talked of making a rule about it, it is already in the TOU.

whaaaaaaaaaaa My Head Hurts now -__-

It seems serious debates are out of the question in here.
Herpy derp back to bantering.