TOPIC: Need help for writing

Introduction :
Jean Carbonnier said about legal liability: "We must repair the evil, do what seems to have been only a dream." This quotation refers to the leading role that civil liability has in society. The purpose of tort law is to compensate the injured party. Legal liability includes non-contractual liability, which includes not only tort liability but also contractual liability. In common incur law; tort liability can only if specific offenses, called "torts", have been committed. The English Tort Law is marked by casuistic traces. The term tort applies in English law to refer to civil wrongs. The torts refer to situations where a breach of a rule of law of a legal duty requires the wrongdoer to make good the damage suffered by the victim. Some torts are based on intentional or accidental harm to the person, such as assault or battery. There are other torts such as trespass to land and trespass to chattels or again nuisance or defamation. Nevertheless, the main "torts" is negligence. The tort of negligence is a legal wrong that is suffered by one person at the hands of another who is not careful to avoid what a reasonable person would consider a foreseeable risk. There is a duty of care. You are negligent if you unintentionally cause injury to someone in a situation where you should have known your action could cause harm. The injured party may bring civil proceedings against the other party to recover the damages. Since prerogative law is at the heart of the common law, the contribution of certain judgments has been crucial in the development of the English law of tortious liability. The case law Donoghue v Stevenson rendered in 1932 shows that despite the absence of a contract, express or implied, legal liability will only be recognized in the presence of a special duty of care by considering the behavior of the good family man and whether the actions or omissions injuring a person could have been reasonably foreseeable manner. Such a duty of care can be applied very broadly, and therefore, this case law has made it more difficult to establish the existence of such an obligation. In the jurisprudence Anns v Merton rendered in 1978, refined the principle of the neighbor of the jurisprudence of 1932 through a two-stage test which was finally replaced by the tripartite test put in place in the jurisprudence Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman rendered in 1990. For there to be a recognizance of liability of a wrongdoer, it is necessary that the damage be reasonably foreseeable, that there be proximity and that it be just and reasonable to impose a duty of responsibility. So, we may ask how the victim of a negligent tort can obtain redress? We will see that Punitive damages can be awarded if the plaintiff has succeeded in proving four conditions, which are the first duty of care and standard of care; A breach of duty, then causation and finally damages.

To conclude, we have seen throughout its development that a victim can obtain damages and interest when the 4 elements are combined that is a duty of care and standard of care; A breach of duty, then causation and finally damages. We also saw that the defendant has the possibility of exonerating himself from his liability by 4 means which are Contributory negligence. Comparative negligence, assumption of the risk and immunity. We could ask ourselves what would be the difference between french legal liability and English legal liability, the one that would best benefit victims.