TOPIC: @dankek

This ain’t adding up lmao, how does killing yourself 2 times to avoid punishment warrant a PERMANANT ban? Which policy states it? Who told you it? Why does exploiting for 85 bil and fucking up the economy not warrant a perm ban? Please explain your logic

I’d rather not have this locked or moved as it belongs in general discussion. Thanks lads

illegalimmigrant514 wrote:
Who exploited for 85Bi


Also you have 9 recents or some shit and if you add exploiting on top of that...

I'd like to let you know that me and Naruto, the people who spread the exploit have been infact permanently banned, the rest of the people who exploited are just people who we dragged into this, not to mention, you can appeal a permanent ban but you cannot revert the item reset, causing people like EiPUS and Naruto to lose all of their items that they got before even though their impact on the economy added up for less then 1bil, which in my opinion is even harsher considering they stopped when told to, unlike you with as Comfy mentioned 9 recents and as you said avoiding punishment.

Tamaninja wrote: Hes just trying to find something to bitch about, Ignore him tama

Tamaninja wrote:
Wasn’t banned for it nor do not have 9 recents. I wasn’t even in trouble for it. He said on forums multiple times it was permbannable so I wanted some elaboration.

It's somewhat binary thinking in my opinion when it comes to this specific exploit, but exploiting is a very serious offence, and can warrant a permanent ban after multiple offences. I personally wouldn't agree on a permanent ban for avoiding arrest twice using the exploit, since it is relatively harmless compared to other exploits, but if it perpetuates I could agree.

The policy for exploiting is 1rst offence warn, 2nd offence permaban, I've done it to many people.


-Lock

dankek wrote: I'm sorry but where exactly you see such 'policy'?

SkeletonWarrior wrote:
He's probably referring to serious exploits that can be game-breaking and/or ruin players' experiences etc. where this would generally apply

Rick Johnson wrote: Most likely but it's not a policy

Rick Johnson wrote: no, I'm referring to all and any exploit, thats how it's punished, I've talked about this in the past with Lombardi when he was HA, simple as that sry m9

dankek wrote: Yeah I dont rly care if tou talked to god himself or Tony but there isn't such policy

SkeletonWarrior wrote:
Yup. But it would apply in most serious cases.

SkeletonWarrior wrote: yh, i don't really give a fuck either though, so it's pointless actually replying to me, I said LOCK

dankek wrote:
1. It's not ur post

2. You're wrong

SkeletonWarrior wrote: 1. The minge is replying to me and I replied, you "corrected" me so all is good, you should fucking lock unless you don't understand the concept

2. I'm not, but I don't care either because my opinion doesn't mean jack shit rn and I just hop on the forums to spend some time.

u gonna lock now since its been handled or not?

Killing yourself in a sit or running away etc is not exploiting. However it is a disruptive behaver that is stopping administrative work and it is punishable. However it is like anyother rulebreak and it is not an extream case such as Prop Spamming or Scamming which would warrent a perma ban.

Regarding what Dankek has said. For actual exploits there is no such policy that says 1st offence warn 2nd perma ban. Most commonly that is what happens but every case is different and there isn't a set rule or policy.

If you feel like your punishment was unfair or too harsh feel free to appeal it.