TOPIC: @HoneyPot

Hey Honeypot, please refund me, thanks.

Raeker wrote:
Because he definitely "stole" money from them didn't he...

What is scamming?

ToBeHonest wrote: tbh give me a jugg

Raeker the title itself say 9 BILLION """"MILESTONE""""" GIVE AWAY

Milestone definition
"A significant stage or event in the development of something."

I was happy with my progress and decided to do a giveaway and that the price was unspecified.

HoneyPot wrote:
So explain this "There will be 5 winners who'll win it all"

Katje wrote:
When someone does something to get something by something the someone because someone wants that something from that someone.

HoneyPot wrote:
So explain this "There will be 5 winners who'll win it all"

"All" isn't necessarily pointing to the 9B mentioned. Let me elaborate real quick.


"Hi! I'm doing a giveaway because i hit 9 billion dolla! All of the prize will be shared between the winners"

AlphaLyle wrote:
What's something?

Katje wrote:
Something is a thing that something something that something does to something something to something but something is something something so it is a something something something

Hopefully you understand now. You're welcome!

DEADMONSTOR wrote:
To save Mr Por some time, i had already provided a response to that argument earlier in the thread if you care to look.

5 winners will win my unspecified prize pool // which has now been listed // may not seem a lot but its all relative I also added 2 bonus people that have won carrot seeds

AlphaLyle wrote:
What is something that something does to something?

Katje wrote:
Something that something does to something is a thing that something does to something something to something but something is something something so it is a something something that something something something does to something something to something but something is something something so it is a something something something. So in something to something something it must something to something something!

Bunnyslippers69 wrote:
Obviously asking the person that wrote it would be a better idea. I would like to see what he meant not some random. Thanks for your help though!


This argument is so biased because 90% of the people in the giveaway ASSUMED that Honey Pot was going to giveaway 9billion. They shouldn't be blaming him for not giving them what they WANT. Sure it could be considered MISLEADING, but only if people had read extremely carefully, especially in a scenario like this where a bundle of cash is assumed to be given away, they would realise that he never SPECIFIED how much money he was going to give away. Arguing that this is considered scamming as its "decieving", it states in the rules that he needs to have STOLE something but clearly he didn't. Apparently if Honey doesn't pay the supposed 9BIL people assumed he was gonna give out, he won't be unbanbned, yet people who have posted "giveaways" have somehow managed to have juked the ban hammer even though they didn't pay out a single $. weird

AlphaLyle wrote:
But if something is that something why is that something doing the something to the other something while the something something is effecting the something something something ?