TOPIC: Hello SSRP Staff!

I'm going to say my honest opinion. First of all I did state that you were a great admin and I did vote yes. However I can not disagree with the arguments which were mentioned. The first big negative is that you get dragged into and assosiate yourself with people like Rob etc. miss behaving causing issues. I'm not saying that you do it yourself however I know from experience jokes can go far at times and I did hear that you had also shown a slightly bad attitude to individuals I'm not going to state. Another thing is last time you were admin for 3weeks then decided to resign and later revoke and resign again. This shows some inconsistancy. And what going for Mod will prove is that you would keep a good behaver and will be nice to everyone as you have a motivation that you want admin.

SkeletonWarrior wrote:
You can't deny someone cus of his friends and by the way if u check my rap sheet you will most likely find a punishment off of micky which already proves he isn't corrupt along with this when micky staffed on pointshop servers he also assisted and in fact banned me a couple times so u can't blame it on his friends as that's invalid

Also you long necked snake ever say I'm a bad influence and I'll be sure to bring up your demotion in the community team meeting

SkeletonWarrior wrote:
I'll will try to debunk somethings mentioned in this, although I do understand where you're coming from.
Firstly thank you for the support.

Regarding some of my friends dragging me into things, I imagine (correct me if I am wrong) this about when some of my friends get warned and I end up speaking to the admin, I don't know how it would look for them, maybe I am helping the rule breaker but what I do is just point out facts that staff members may of missed. Recently something similar happened involving Rob getting warned and I did speak to the staff member warning him as well as a head admin to defend him. Again that may of looked like I was protecting a person breaking the rules, but I am just making sure that the players are not falsely warned and in that case Rob was falsely warned and got the punishment removed (I believe).
As I have stated before on another post, my friends should not affect what people view me as, if I choose to be friends with someone who breaks rules then that is that. People should not automatically assume that I would be like them just because I am friends with them, that is just straight prejudice.

As far as I am aware I do not interact with other players or staff members unless I have to or if I a somewhat acquainted with them so I do not possible know who I had a bad attitude towards.

Regarding when I was admin, I resigned because I had extremely important exams coming up, which is all over, my next few exams are next year. For me at least I believe it was worth resigning considering that I did pass all of my course and end of year exam. I have a lot of free time now so a resignation would not be on my mind.

Mico wrote: Thanks for making this more clearer for us, it'll help if you decide to apply for Admin again but no doubt about you getting Mod tbh.

who is mico

Clarky wrote:
He worked harder then most to get admin and did a superb job when he obtained it so I don't get why u are telling him to go for mod first considering how good of a staff member he has been? Surely since he is good giving him access to the majority of commands would benefit the server more then him being held back as moderator for no reason at all when he clearly deserves the higher rank of admin

A Good Pianist wrote: IMO I didn't like how he went out and broke a mass amount of rules after being staff hence why I wasn't so comfortable with giving him admin. I honestly woudln't of mind if he did get admin but that was the negative I had in mind.

Clarky wrote:
I would hardly say mass rule broke but ok I am not going to waste time arguing with u but genuinely a month without punishments.... and then blame attitude that clearly isn't recent just to deny him is extremely petty and sloppy from within the staff team on there judgement that's all.

SkeletonWarrior wrote:
oh no im friends with 100 cm banned members cm ban me now to!

Clarky wrote: I'll be honest I do not really have an excuse for that, I believe it was you that banned me for it. That was a dick move my bad, but considering how long ago that was and the attempts of changing I have shown on the server over a large period of time can somewhat compensate for what happened in a couple of hours. I am not saying you should overlook that situation but in my opinion a month onward of good behaviour and following the rules with no legitimate proof of me having shown bad attitude to staff and/or players can compensate for a couple of hours where I broke around 7 or 8 rules. I think it was 7 recents I was banned for.

No beef on this post thanks!

Latram wrote: Good question

Latram wrote: some loser

iFreshFruit wrote: You're a real victim

SkeletonWarrior wrote:
He had the same friends when he got admin last time, what changed

Mico wrote:
I’m aware that it’s kind of a dumb policy but unless it’s an extreme case (like if Chummy chose to come back for staffing and applied for admin) I vote no for pretty much everyone trying to skip Admin, and although I’m sure you were a good staff member I just didn’t know enough about it to justify voting yes.

A Sloth wrote: Could you explain what Chummy does that shows you that he should gain your vote over what I have done recently and in the past.

"I don't care that his attitude has been good for the last few weeks, he's just putting on an act to get admin and it's not going to fool me. I don't care if he was a good staff member, he's putting on an act and his attitude will just be shit" A staff member I spoke to on the topic

Blocked wrote:
great guy Micky ;-;

Kyber wrote: I like to be neutral on these kinds of topics, but that anonimous staff member sounds like a bigger dickhead than Micky ever has been. No offense to whoever thinks that about Micky, but if you're going to show that kind of an undeserved attitude towards someone who I know is entirely sincere about getting staff then the issue is the staff member themselves, not Micky.