[SSRP] Microsoft Access's Warn Appeal
7 years 5 months ago #582453
Name - What is your in-game name? Microsoft Birdman Anderson
STEAM-ID - What is your STEAM-ID? STEAM_0:0:49816657
Staff Members Name - Who Warned You? Latram
Warning Reason - What was the reason of the warning(s)? "Lying in Sit" "Ammo Exploit"
Server - Which Server did this occur on? Server 1
Story/Situation (What Happened?) - While I fully admit I ammo exploited and i'm not going to give a shitty excuse why, I feel like he went way too far in this one and it was EXTREMELY biased, I haven't been warned in months, and I get 2 warnings for 1 little thing. I said that his proof of it was weak and that I COULD HAVE had a full clip, which he completely disregarded. I feel like a verbal in that situation would have been fair, not 2 WARNS. In the past he has been known to only warn people for stuff that he was a part of.
Extra Information - Anything you would find relevant to your warning(s)? Maybe 1 warning at max would have been more fair, but 2? This guy needs re training if I must say.
[SSRP] Microsoft Access's Warn Appeal
7 years 5 months ago #582457
MicrosoftAccess wrote:
Name - What is your in-game name? Microsoft Birdman Anderson
STEAM-ID - What is your STEAM-ID? STEAM_0:0:49816657
Staff Members Name - Who Warned You? Latram
Warning Reason - What was the reason of the warning(s)? "Lying in Sit" "Ammo Exploit"
Server - Which Server did this occur on? Server 1
Story/Situation (What Happened?) - While I fully admit I ammo exploited and i'm not going to give a shitty excuse why, I feel like he went way too far in this one and it was EXTREMELY biased, I haven't been warned in months, and I get 2 warnings for 1 little thing. I said that his proof of it was weak and that I COULD HAVE had a full clip, which he completely disregarded. I feel like a verbal in that situation would have been fair, not 2 WARNS. In the past he has been known to only warn people for stuff that he was a part of.
Extra Information - Anything you would find relevant to your warning(s)? Maybe 1 warning at max would have been more fair, but 2? This guy needs re training if I must say.
[SSRP] Microsoft Access's Warn Appeal
7 years 5 months ago #582459
Xeronise wrote:
MicrosoftAccess wrote:
Name - What is your in-game name? Microsoft Birdman Anderson
STEAM-ID - What is your STEAM-ID? STEAM_0:0:49816657
Staff Members Name - Who Warned You? Latram
Warning Reason - What was the reason of the warning(s)? "Lying in Sit" "Ammo Exploit"
Server - Which Server did this occur on? Server 1
Story/Situation (What Happened?) - While I fully admit I ammo exploited and i'm not going to give a shitty excuse why, I feel like he went way too far in this one and it was EXTREMELY biased, I haven't been warned in months, and I get 2 warnings for 1 little thing. I said that his proof of it was weak and that I COULD HAVE had a full clip, which he completely disregarded. I feel like a verbal in that situation would have been fair, not 2 WARNS. In the past he has been known to only warn people for stuff that he was a part of.
Extra Information - Anything you would find relevant to your warning(s)? Maybe 1 warning at max would have been more fair, but 2? This guy needs re training if I must say.
[SSRP] Microsoft Access's Warn Appeal
7 years 5 months ago #582460
Xeronise wrote:
MicrosoftAccess wrote:
Name - What is your in-game name? Microsoft Birdman Anderson
STEAM-ID - What is your STEAM-ID? STEAM_0:0:49816657
Staff Members Name - Who Warned You? Latram
Warning Reason - What was the reason of the warning(s)? "Lying in Sit" "Ammo Exploit"
Server - Which Server did this occur on? Server 1
Story/Situation (What Happened?) - While I fully admit I ammo exploited and i'm not going to give a shitty excuse why, I feel like he went way too far in this one and it was EXTREMELY biased, I haven't been warned in months, and I get 2 warnings for 1 little thing. I said that his proof of it was weak and that I COULD HAVE had a full clip, which he completely disregarded. I feel like a verbal in that situation would have been fair, not 2 WARNS. In the past he has been known to only warn people for stuff that he was a part of.
Extra Information - Anything you would find relevant to your warning(s)? Maybe 1 warning at max would have been more fair, but 2? This guy needs re training if I must say.
Lying again lmao
"While I fully admit I ammo exploited and i'm not going to give a shitty excuse why" yes, that is totally lying.
[SSRP] Microsoft Access's Warn Appeal
7 years 5 months ago #582461
Megumin wrote:
Xeronise wrote:
MicrosoftAccess wrote:
Name - What is your in-game name? Microsoft Birdman Anderson
STEAM-ID - What is your STEAM-ID? STEAM_0:0:49816657
Staff Members Name - Who Warned You? Latram
Warning Reason - What was the reason of the warning(s)? "Lying in Sit" "Ammo Exploit"
Server - Which Server did this occur on? Server 1
Story/Situation (What Happened?) - While I fully admit I ammo exploited and i'm not going to give a shitty excuse why, I feel like he went way too far in this one and it was EXTREMELY biased, I haven't been warned in months, and I get 2 warnings for 1 little thing. I said that his proof of it was weak and that I COULD HAVE had a full clip, which he completely disregarded. I feel like a verbal in that situation would have been fair, not 2 WARNS. In the past he has been known to only warn people for stuff that he was a part of.
Extra Information - Anything you would find relevant to your warning(s)? Maybe 1 warning at max would have been more fair, but 2? This guy needs re training if I must say.
Lying again lmao
He could have had a full magazine?
Doesnt really prove anything
You clearly see him shoot multiple times?????????????????
[SSRP] Microsoft Access's Warn Appeal
7 years 5 months ago #582479
Megumin wrote:
Xeronise wrote:
MicrosoftAccess wrote:
Name - What is your in-game name? Microsoft Birdman Anderson
STEAM-ID - What is your STEAM-ID? STEAM_0:0:49816657
Staff Members Name - Who Warned You? Latram
Warning Reason - What was the reason of the warning(s)? "Lying in Sit" "Ammo Exploit"
Server - Which Server did this occur on? Server 1
Story/Situation (What Happened?) - While I fully admit I ammo exploited and i'm not going to give a shitty excuse why, I feel like he went way too far in this one and it was EXTREMELY biased, I haven't been warned in months, and I get 2 warnings for 1 little thing. I said that his proof of it was weak and that I COULD HAVE had a full clip, which he completely disregarded. I feel like a verbal in that situation would have been fair, not 2 WARNS. In the past he has been known to only warn people for stuff that he was a part of.
Extra Information - Anything you would find relevant to your warning(s)? Maybe 1 warning at max would have been more fair, but 2? This guy needs re training if I must say.
Lying again lmao
He could have had a full magazine?
Doesnt really prove anything
You don't even play ssrp, so how would you know what ammo exploiting is, and how to do it?
[SSRP] Microsoft Access's Warn Appeal
7 years 5 months ago #582727
After speaking with Latram we have decided to remove the warning of "Lying in sit" as you admitted to it yet your "Ammo Exploit" warning will remain, also next time please don't slander or it will be taken further.