TOPIC: [TTT] Jordan's Warning Appeal

First of all, I'd like to enform that I would NOT like ParaMontana to handle my warning appeal.

Name - What is your in-game name? Jordz
STEAM-ID - What is your STEAM-ID?
Staff Members Name - Who Warned You? R-Flex
Warning Reason - What was the reason of the warning(s)? False Kos-Lying in report
Server - Which Server did this occur on? TTT
Story/Situation (What Happened?) - Let me explain in detail here:

So I was playing TTT as I had an application opened, So I was gaining my activity on it while having fun, Next thing I knew ParaMontana Joined along side with Sally Skobo and para called her "My booboo" or something across those lines, So a few rounds passed then Para left while Sally was still playing. So I became a detective then a couple of minutes passed, Someone called a Suspicion on Sally Skobo for not indetifiing bodies or something If I can remember. Then I saw a body on the ground had been recently placed there as the before I conducted the search was 30 seconds or so, so as I was the Detective when you press E on a body you can see who the player saw last, Prior to the Suspicion on her/him earlier I then proceeded to call a KOS on her for the following reason that I statted above. Now frankly that warning that I received was un-needed as I still do and will fight for this warning as I know that I done nothing wrong and then I get a report on me. So after I got the report I typed !repond and told my side that I had a DNA on her as well as the suspicion and along side the last person that the person who died saw, Then I waited about 30 minutes for the report to be handled but nobody handled it so I then left to go out to someones house. So frankly, ofcourse yeah I'm pissed about the warning along with the slay that I had no intention of getting nor breaking ANY rules to receive. Now I'm not saying R-Flex is wrong what so ever, I'm saying the report on me is bullshit and not needed at all.

Extra Information - Anything you would find relevant to your warning(s)? Once again, I would NOT like to have ParaMontana handling this appeal, with that said thanks for your time.

I'll handle this and speak to R-Flex about this warning.

I will also be handling this and try get the situation correct.

dank doúble un handlé


you should also report r-flex for this as it seems unfair and bias'd.

Extremely disapointed in the fact that you told me you think i will be biast and unprofessional towards the outcome of this appeal because im friends with sally.

lMichaell wrote: No, As I said I love R-Flex to bits and the report on me was false as I was and still had every right to kill the person. It got locked before I could reply my side to it.

lMichaell wrote: Damn you seem to know alot about the situation.

Para came on for a brief few seconds to remove two false warnings.

AA RFLeX wrote:
from reading the actual post which I doubt you did, it seems pretty obvious if true.

lMichaell wrote: Ok feel free to make a demote request then.

lMichaell wrote: Michael, stop causing drama on my thread buddy, With all due respect I want this done and dusted I don't want to cause drama.

Your my friend and all but im going to have to give this a due to the fact that you lied and said that sally didnt identify the body when logs clearly show that she did. But i think you have learned your lesson and you put some effort into this

Hamzah wrote:
Thanks dude, I like you too. Now with that said, let me tell you why. From where I was, Someone was at the body and then as I ran up closer it was unidentified. So if you'd kindly see it from my pov you'd see from my prospective on how the warning was un-needed as I done nothing wrong.

Should have given a verbal warning since this might've been a difficult situation.

spodermon wrote:
R-Flex couldn't verbal me due to me being away out to someones house and the report was made ingame first but then I waited a while and Marshmallow was AFK/unable to handle the report.

I think a simple verbal warning should have been given as this was a first offence anyway, you shouldn't have even been warned as it is the first time you supposedly done anything bad

ParaMontana wrote: Personal Opinion.

I support dis

It's rather unfortunate that no staffmember was available at the time of the report, as we now have a story with two sides that could be true. I suggest you, Sally, Rflex and the handling admin go sit together to reconstruct the whole story.

I'm going to get Sally's side of the story after hearing Jordan's side, expect a reply possibly tomorrow.

Clarky wrote: Aight, Thanks Clarky!