Login to ZARP
Username: Password: Remember me
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2

TOPIC: [SSRP] Ban Appeal Smol dong

[SSRP] Ban Appeal Smol dong 4 years 6 months ago #1226829

Name - What is your in-game name? Smol dong
STEAM-ID - What is your STEAM-ID? STEAM_0:0:204543170
Admins Name - Who banned you/who might it be? Hiro
Reason - What is/might be the reason that you got banned? Crashing Others
Server - What server did you get banned from? SSRP
Time - How long were you banned for? Perm
Story - What happened? I made an attempt to crash Niko's alts. Also, Hiro's but he didn't really care and I was gonna refund. I never successfully crashed any of their alts. My ban was placed a week after I made my attempts. I'd like to apologize to Niko for my attempt to crash his accounts. All of the people who are now banned from this had no clue it was a rule. It was only an attempt and I am very sorry to those who I tried to crash.
Proof - Any proof on a video/screenshot that clearly shows what happened? There isn't any.
Extra Information - Anything you think may be relevant to your ban.

A bit hard to hear since some dumbass was BEGGING for a gjugg from Chute.
  • Smol
  • Smol's Avatar
  • Offline
  • User is blocked
  • ZARP VIP
  • Posts: 2718
  • Thanks received: 1092
  • Karma: 27
Last Edit: 4 years 6 months ago by Smol.
The topic has been locked.

[SSRP] Ban Appeal Smol dong 4 years 6 months ago #1226830

Didn't mean to post but ok I guess. Can someone move to appeals? Thanks :clap:
  • Smol
  • Smol's Avatar
  • Offline
  • User is blocked
  • ZARP VIP
  • Posts: 2718
  • Thanks received: 1092
  • Karma: 27
Last Edit: 4 years 6 months ago by Smol.
The topic has been locked.

[SSRP] Ban Appeal Smol dong 4 years 6 months ago #1226831

jusu free smol bring them back
  • Killa Kappa
  • Killa Kappa's Avatar
  • Offline
  • User is blocked
  • ZARP VIP
  • Posts: 14508
  • Thanks received: 6725
  • Karma: -3121
The topic has been locked.

[SSRP] Ban Appeal Smol dong 4 years 6 months ago #1226832

FREE SMOL DONG BRING HIM BACK

:support:
  • Sp00ns
  • Sp00ns's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Expert Boarder
  • ZARP VIP Golden Blue Badge
  • Posts: 1145
  • Thanks received: 427
  • Karma: -37
The topic has been locked.

[SSRP] Ban Appeal Smol dong 4 years 6 months ago #1226833

I will contact Hiro!
  • OnionRings
  • OnionRings's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Community Manager
  • ZARP VIP Golden Blue Badge
  • Posts: 10896
  • Thanks received: 5656
  • Karma: -565
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Smol

[SSRP] Ban Appeal Smol dong 4 years 6 months ago #1226836

OnionRings wrote:
I will contact Hiro!
the fish is pogging ?
  • Legendary
  • Legendary's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Expert Boarder
  • $1,134
  • Posts: 865
  • Thanks received: 189
  • Karma: -24
The topic has been locked.

[SSRP] Ban Appeal Smol dong 4 years 6 months ago #1226837

It's good that you're honest about what your intentions were, good luck man!
  • narexa
  • narexa's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Divine Boarder
  • ZARP VIP Golden Blue Badge
  • Posts: 8287
  • Thanks received: 4844
  • Karma: 252
The topic has been locked.

[SSRP] Ban Appeal Smol dong 4 years 6 months ago #1226859

:plussp:
Free Smol
  • Zarpgaming
  • Zarpgaming's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Gold Boarder
  • ZARP VIP
  • Posts: 1656
  • Thanks received: 622
  • Karma: 22
The topic has been locked.

[SSRP] Ban Appeal Smol dong 4 years 6 months ago #1226864

Smol wrote:
All of the people who are now banned from this had no clue it was a rule.

  • TheXnator
  • TheXnator's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Former Owner
  • ZARP VIP Golden Blue Badge
  • "Save the tears for when we win!"
  • Posts: 8122
  • Thanks received: 4292
  • Karma: -2024
Discord: thexnator

Former Community Owner: 2020-2022
The topic has been locked.

[SSRP] Ban Appeal Smol dong 4 years 6 months ago #1226869

TheXnator wrote:
Smol wrote:
All of the people who are now banned from this had no clue it was a rule.

How does that say ‘if you make it so someone’s computer can’t handle something to make them crash then you’ll be punished’ exploiting is so vague and it doesn’t even cover it, yes it’s unintentional to crash someone but they’re literally using an in game feature that didn’t even cause anyone to crash. Honestly it’s so vague that it’s hard to understand, yes they were maliciously trying to get someone to crash however it’s not very explicit, and leaves lots of room for different interpretations. However it’s pretty obvious that if these lights crash your game you shouldn’t have alts on the server
  • Kyber
  • Kyber's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Legendary Member
  • ZARP VIP
  • Something original and funny
  • Posts: 8485
  • Thanks received: 2620
  • Karma: -125

Legendary Member








The topic has been locked.

[SSRP] Ban Appeal Smol dong 4 years 6 months ago #1226870

Kyber wrote:
TheXnator wrote:
Smol wrote:
All of the people who are now banned from this had no clue it was a rule.

How does that say ‘if you make it so someone’s computer can’t handle something to make them crash then you’ll be punished’ exploiting is so vague and it doesn’t even cover it, yes it’s unintentional to crash someone but they’re literally using an in game feature that didn’t even cause anyone to crash. Honestly it’s so vague that it’s hard to understand, yes they were maliciously trying to get someone to crash however it’s not very explicit, and leaves lots of room for different interpretations. However it’s pretty obvious that if these lights crash your game you shouldn’t have alts on the server
Because it's abuse of an unintentional game feature
  • Lewis_is_java
  • Lewis_is_java's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Adept Boarder
  • ZARP VIP
  • Λεωνίδᾱς
  • Posts: 7205
  • Thanks received: 4709
  • Karma: -65
The topic has been locked.

[SSRP] Ban Appeal Smol dong 4 years 6 months ago #1226871

TheXnator wrote:
Smol wrote:
All of the people who are now banned from this had no clue it was a rule.

However that’s rules meaning never mattered when it came to punishing me for exploiting the dark matter gun?
  • Smol
  • Smol's Avatar
  • Offline
  • User is blocked
  • ZARP VIP
  • Posts: 2718
  • Thanks received: 1092
  • Karma: 27
The topic has been locked.

[SSRP] Ban Appeal Smol dong 4 years 6 months ago #1226872

Lewis_is_java wrote:
Kyber wrote:
TheXnator wrote:
Smol wrote:
All of the people who are now banned from this had no clue it was a rule.

How does that say ‘if you make it so someone’s computer can’t handle something to make them crash then you’ll be punished’ exploiting is so vague and it doesn’t even cover it, yes it’s unintentional to crash someone but they’re literally using an in game feature that didn’t even cause anyone to crash. Honestly it’s so vague that it’s hard to understand, yes they were maliciously trying to get someone to crash however it’s not very explicit, and leaves lots of room for different interpretations. However it’s pretty obvious that if these lights crash your game you shouldn’t have alts on the server
Because it's abuse of an unintentional game feature
Honestly, I can see both sides of this argument. Yes it’s unintentional that players crash due to this. However if a light is causing an alt to crash and your connection to the server is that volatile then you probably shouldn’t be having alts
  • Kyber
  • Kyber's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Legendary Member
  • ZARP VIP
  • Something original and funny
  • Posts: 8485
  • Thanks received: 2620
  • Karma: -125

Legendary Member








The topic has been locked.

[SSRP] Ban Appeal Smol dong 4 years 6 months ago #1226873

Kyber wrote:
TheXnator wrote:
Smol wrote:
All of the people who are now banned from this had no clue it was a rule.

How does that say ‘if you make it so someone’s computer can’t handle something to make them crash then you’ll be punished’ exploiting is so vague and it doesn’t even cover it, yes it’s unintentional to crash someone but they’re literally using an in game feature that didn’t even cause anyone to crash. Honestly it’s so vague that it’s hard to understand, yes they were maliciously trying to get someone to crash however it’s not very explicit, and leaves lots of room for different interpretations. However it’s pretty obvious that if these lights crash your game you shouldn’t have alts on the server

Everything on both ends was settled for. everyone forgave each other and just wants to play the server again no harm was caused and i think everyone that got banned for this should be unbanned
  • Sp00ns
  • Sp00ns's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Expert Boarder
  • ZARP VIP Golden Blue Badge
  • Posts: 1145
  • Thanks received: 427
  • Karma: -37
Last Edit: 4 years 6 months ago by Sp00ns.
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Zarpgaming

[SSRP] Ban Appeal Smol dong 4 years 6 months ago #1226875

As a retired best pvper of zarpgaming i approve this appeal
:support:
  • TrixX
  • TrixX's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Expert Boarder
  • ZARP VIP
  • Muslamic Vision
  • Posts: 892
  • Thanks received: 284
  • Karma: -28
The topic has been locked.

[SSRP] Ban Appeal Smol dong 4 years 6 months ago #1226876

Kyber wrote:
Lewis_is_java wrote:
Kyber wrote:
TheXnator wrote:
Smol wrote:
All of the people who are now banned from this had no clue it was a rule.

How does that say ‘if you make it so someone’s computer can’t handle something to make them crash then you’ll be punished’ exploiting is so vague and it doesn’t even cover it, yes it’s unintentional to crash someone but they’re literally using an in game feature that didn’t even cause anyone to crash. Honestly it’s so vague that it’s hard to understand, yes they were maliciously trying to get someone to crash however it’s not very explicit, and leaves lots of room for different interpretations. However it’s pretty obvious that if these lights crash your game you shouldn’t have alts on the server
Because it's abuse of an unintentional game feature
Honestly, I can see both sides of this argument. Yes it’s unintentional that players crash due to this. However if a light is causing an alt to crash and your connection to the server is that volatile then you probably shouldn’t be having alts
That's like saying it's your fault for not being invincible when you got rdmd
  • Lewis_is_java
  • Lewis_is_java's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Adept Boarder
  • ZARP VIP
  • Λεωνίδᾱς
  • Posts: 7205
  • Thanks received: 4709
  • Karma: -65
The topic has been locked.

[SSRP] Ban Appeal Smol dong 4 years 6 months ago #1226879

Sp00ns wrote:
Kyber wrote:
TheXnator wrote:
Smol wrote:
All of the people who are now banned from this had no clue it was a rule.

How does that say ‘if you make it so someone’s computer can’t handle something to make them crash then you’ll be punished’ exploiting is so vague and it doesn’t even cover it, yes it’s unintentional to crash someone but they’re literally using an in game feature that didn’t even cause anyone to crash. Honestly it’s so vague that it’s hard to understand, yes they were maliciously trying to get someone to crash however it’s not very explicit, and leaves lots of room for different interpretations. However it’s pretty obvious that if these lights crash your game you shouldn’t have alts on the server

Everything on both ends was settled for. everyone forgave each other and just wants to play the server again no harm was caused and i think everyone that got banned for this should be unbanned
I understand that, but once the ban is placed then the staff literally have the right to say ‘fuck off we don’t want you on the server anymore’ even if all is forgiven. By escalating it to this in the first place this problem has been caused.
  • Kyber
  • Kyber's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Legendary Member
  • ZARP VIP
  • Something original and funny
  • Posts: 8485
  • Thanks received: 2620
  • Karma: -125

Legendary Member








The topic has been locked.

[SSRP] Ban Appeal Smol dong 4 years 6 months ago #1226881

Lewis_is_java wrote:
Kyber wrote:
Lewis_is_java wrote:
Kyber wrote:
TheXnator wrote:
Smol wrote:
All of the people who are now banned from this had no clue it was a rule.

How does that say ‘if you make it so someone’s computer can’t handle something to make them crash then you’ll be punished’ exploiting is so vague and it doesn’t even cover it, yes it’s unintentional to crash someone but they’re literally using an in game feature that didn’t even cause anyone to crash. Honestly it’s so vague that it’s hard to understand, yes they were maliciously trying to get someone to crash however it’s not very explicit, and leaves lots of room for different interpretations. However it’s pretty obvious that if these lights crash your game you shouldn’t have alts on the server
Because it's abuse of an unintentional game feature
Honestly, I can see both sides of this argument. Yes it’s unintentional that players crash due to this. However if a light is causing an alt to crash and your connection to the server is that volatile then you probably shouldn’t be having alts
That's like saying it's your fault for not being invincible when you got rdmd
Can you please elaborate on that? I don’t seem to get the analogy and how they link
  • Kyber
  • Kyber's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Legendary Member
  • ZARP VIP
  • Something original and funny
  • Posts: 8485
  • Thanks received: 2620
  • Karma: -125

Legendary Member








The topic has been locked.

[SSRP] Ban Appeal Smol dong 4 years 6 months ago #1226882

Kyber wrote:
Lewis_is_java wrote:
Kyber wrote:
Lewis_is_java wrote:
Kyber wrote:
TheXnator wrote:
Smol wrote:
All of the people who are now banned from this had no clue it was a rule.

How does that say ‘if you make it so someone’s computer can’t handle something to make them crash then you’ll be punished’ exploiting is so vague and it doesn’t even cover it, yes it’s unintentional to crash someone but they’re literally using an in game feature that didn’t even cause anyone to crash. Honestly it’s so vague that it’s hard to understand, yes they were maliciously trying to get someone to crash however it’s not very explicit, and leaves lots of room for different interpretations. However it’s pretty obvious that if these lights crash your game you shouldn’t have alts on the server
Because it's abuse of an unintentional game feature
Honestly, I can see both sides of this argument. Yes it’s unintentional that players crash due to this. However if a light is causing an alt to crash and your connection to the server is that volatile then you probably shouldn’t be having alts
That's like saying it's your fault for not being invincible when you got rdmd
Can you please elaborate on that? I don’t seem to get the analogy and how they link
You basically said it's the other persons fault because they can be crashed, my analgoy is it's like you saying it's someones fault for being rdmd because they can be killed
  • Lewis_is_java
  • Lewis_is_java's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Adept Boarder
  • ZARP VIP
  • Λεωνίδᾱς
  • Posts: 7205
  • Thanks received: 4709
  • Karma: -65
The topic has been locked.

[SSRP] Ban Appeal Smol dong 4 years 6 months ago #1226883

Kyber wrote:
Sp00ns wrote:
Kyber wrote:
TheXnator wrote:
Smol wrote:
All of the people who are now banned from this had no clue it was a rule.

How does that say ‘if you make it so someone’s computer can’t handle something to make them crash then you’ll be punished’ exploiting is so vague and it doesn’t even cover it, yes it’s unintentional to crash someone but they’re literally using an in game feature that didn’t even cause anyone to crash. Honestly it’s so vague that it’s hard to understand, yes they were maliciously trying to get someone to crash however it’s not very explicit, and leaves lots of room for different interpretations. However it’s pretty obvious that if these lights crash your game you shouldn’t have alts on the server

Everything on both ends was settled for. everyone forgave each other and just wants to play the server again no harm was caused and i think everyone that got banned for this should be unbanned
I understand that, but once the ban is placed then the staff literally have the right to say ‘fuck off we don’t want you on the server anymore’ even if all is forgiven. By escalating it to this in the first place this problem has been caused.

That's true. but like what was said by smol none of the people involved knew that intentionally placing lights would result in a perm ban. now i don't think anyone crashed which is still an attempt but maybe shouldve been punished lighter not knowing the rules is not an excuse but everyone is genuinely sorry and i doubt this will occur again.
  • Sp00ns
  • Sp00ns's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Expert Boarder
  • ZARP VIP Golden Blue Badge
  • Posts: 1145
  • Thanks received: 427
  • Karma: -37
The topic has been locked.
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2
Time to create page: 0.158 seconds

279 PLAYERS ONLINE

Connect to server View Gametracker DarkRP 1
6/127
online
Connect to server View Gametracker Deathrun
0/40
online
Connect to server View Gametracker TTT
0/47
online
Connect to server View Gametracker Bhop
0/32
online
Connect to server View Gametracker Surf
0/32
online
Connect to server View Gametracker Prop Hunt
0/42
online
Connect to server View Gametracker Sandbox
0/42
online
Connect to server Discord
273/910
online
Top