Login to ZARP
Username: Password: Remember me

TOPIC: [SSRP] Micky's Punishment Appeal

[SSRP] Micky's Punishment Appeal 4 years 9 months ago #1196807

cancer rule cancer community
  • SorIe
  • SorIe's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Marvelous Boarder
  • ZARP VIP Golden Blue Badge
  • Posts: 10840
  • Thanks received: 4296
  • Karma: 400

ex-dog LT member on many servers

The topic has been locked.

[SSRP] Micky's Punishment Appeal 4 years 9 months ago #1196809

:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :zarp: :zarp:
:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:sorIe wrote:
cancer rule cancer community
:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:
:clap: :clap: :clap:
  • Katje
  • Katje's Avatar
  • Offline
  • User is blocked
  • ZARP VIP
  • Posts: 5286
  • Thanks received: 844
  • Karma: -73
The topic has been locked.

[SSRP] Micky's Punishment Appeal 4 years 9 months ago #1196864

A Good Pianist wrote:
Hahahahhahaha nice rapsheet mr legendary member.

You know they just want an excuse to take that from you for a 3rd time :^)

why dont i get it back tho >.<

UNBAN MICKY
  • Roy Harper
  • Roy Harper's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Adept Boarder
  • ZARP VIP
  • someone stole my legendary member
  • Posts: 6857
  • Thanks received: 1950
  • Karma: 15


»Ex-DarkRP HeadAdmin«
»Ex-TeamSpeak3 Staff«
»Ex-Appeals Section Mod«
»Ex-Jailbreak Moderator«
»Ex-Bhop Moderator«
The topic has been locked.

[SSRP] Micky's Punishment Appeal 4 years 9 months ago #1196867

I don't get it based on what he got asked to stop ?
  • Suken
  • Suken's Avatar
  • Offline
  • User is blocked
  • ZARP VIP
  • The CoinFlipper
  • Posts: 1074
  • Thanks received: 104
  • Karma: 0
current rank:
EX: Semi-serious Roleplay Administrator
The topic has been locked.

[SSRP] Micky's Punishment Appeal 4 years 9 months ago #1196868

Suken wrote:
I don't get it based on what he got asked to stop ?

Based on the fact that he mentioned a TOU banned member. It's complete bs tho because the TOU clearly states that you shouldn't discuss objectionable content, aka discussing his ban but not the person himself
  • Roy Harper
  • Roy Harper's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Adept Boarder
  • ZARP VIP
  • someone stole my legendary member
  • Posts: 6857
  • Thanks received: 1950
  • Karma: 15


»Ex-DarkRP HeadAdmin«
»Ex-TeamSpeak3 Staff«
»Ex-Appeals Section Mod«
»Ex-Jailbreak Moderator«
»Ex-Bhop Moderator«
The topic has been locked.

[SSRP] Micky's Punishment Appeal 4 years 9 months ago #1196869

sorIe wrote:
cancer rule cancer community
you forgot the 3rd cancer
  • Tamaninja
  • Tamaninja's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Gold Boarder
  • ZARP VIP Golden Blue Badge
  • wag1
  • Posts: 2603
  • Thanks received: 3821
  • Karma: 245
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Micky

[SSRP] Micky's Punishment Appeal 4 years 9 months ago #1196872

This rule has been the gateway to so many false punishments that are handed out. Clarky, you aren't allowed to pick and choose scenarios that you can break a rule, and you especially aren't allowed to modify the rule whenever you want. Both this punishment and the 12 hour ban that Joshua received are ridiculous.
:plussp:
  • Sam the Sausage
  • Sam the Sausage's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Diamond Boarder
  • ZARP VIP
  • Narcan sneedor
  • Posts: 3512
  • Thanks received: 1654
  • Karma: -60
The topic has been locked.

[SSRP] Micky's Punishment Appeal 4 years 9 months ago #1196873

The basic point is these rules are only used when its in the persons favor. Micky didn't mention no bans or the reasoning behind it. He only posted a screenshot that was kinda funny, Along with this it didn't break TOU. If its okay to constantly talk about people like Para, Tyler and many others its no different for Micky.
:plussp:
  • jack bushross
  • jack bushross's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Former Community Manager
  • ZARP VIP
  • Posts: 2155
  • Thanks received: 4929
  • Karma: 29
SSRP- Super Administrator
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: schnitzel nazi, Micky

Micky's Punishment Appeal 4 years 9 months ago #1196876

Clarky wrote:
Markus Chellwigg wrote:
Clarky wrote:
Markus Chellwigg wrote:
Clarky wrote:
I shouldn't have to repeat myself but I'll say it again, the staff's word is final because things was getting way out of hand and you disregarded what I said completely
The staff word may be final, but when what the staff member is saying is a bullshit message that has no grounds normally, they should be able to speak up against it. The fact you all use "staff word is final" as an excuse shows that your argument is flawed and you're using it to save face.
Even if my argument was flawed, the matter of the fact is that i requested for what was being said to be stopped but it wasn’t stopped so what could I realistically do at that point? I’ve been told this was the right thing to do as well so I’m not in the wrong for this according to others including myself but you can think otherwise which is fine
So you are admitting that even when staff members are wrong, theyre right because their word is final? Okay buddy.
Not only this, what about that whole incident a while ago involving morgan where it was AGREED that simply mentioning cm banned members names is fine. Care to explain?
I'm fine when it comes to mentioning a CM banned member normally but there's an extent to where it becomes out of control and that is why I asked twice for it to be stopped but was ignored
Besides Micky can give me a message on TS and I'll be more than happy to discuss it on there with him so it will give him a better understanding since this situation can be resolved within minutes rather than rambling on the forums on who is right and wrong.
I'd rather this be public, it is not only I that requires a good reasoning behind these issues. Think of it as a more practical way of spreading the message to everyone affected and not just me.
  • Micky
  • Micky's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Mythical Boarder
  • ZARP VIP
  • Posts: 5775
  • Thanks received: 7911
  • Karma: -42
Last Edit: 4 years 9 months ago by Micky.
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: schnitzel nazi

[SSRP] Micky's Punishment Appeal 4 years 9 months ago #1196877

EMP wrote:
How do you noobs always confuse this. Its really clear you can’t discuss members with a terms of service ban. It says discussion of Users with a terms of service ban, it does not say discussion of the users ban as discussion of the ban is forbidden because to talk about the ban you would talk about the user. Morgan made a thread a while back about this and it was pretty clear how it works. Mentioning their name is not the same as initiating a discussion about them.
zarpgaming.com/index.php/forum/general-d...nfusion?limitstart=0
  • Sally
  • Sally's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Forum Administrator
  • ZARP VIP
  • Can You Understand How Strange It Is To Be Alive?
  • Posts: 7007
  • Thanks received: 3531
  • Karma: 62


Brother Gustro: sally is a minge
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Clarky

[SSRP] Micky's Punishment Appeal 4 years 9 months ago #1196882

:plussp:
micky dont deserve this wtf
  • B4nQk0k
  • B4nQk0k's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Legendary Member
  • ZARP VIP
  • jeg har 45cc moped
  • Posts: 2185
  • Thanks received: 713
  • Karma: 37
The topic has been locked.

[SSRP] Micky's Punishment Appeal 4 years 9 months ago #1196884

Sally wrote:
EMP wrote:
How do you noobs always confuse this. Its really clear you can’t discuss members with a terms of service ban. It says discussion of Users with a terms of service ban, it does not say discussion of the users ban as discussion of the ban is forbidden because to talk about the ban you would talk about the user. Morgan made a thread a while back about this and it was pretty clear how it works. Mentioning their name is not the same as initiating a discussion about them.
zarpgaming.com/index.php/forum/general-d...nfusion?limitstart=0
Lmao I get it now, the TOU has bad wording is why everyone got confused, literally had to read it about 10 times. It'd be great if they added a and instead of a comma after the word profane to show that discussion is part of the list.
Bad wording got be warned,

EDIT: Is discussion apart of the list?
  • Micky
  • Micky's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Mythical Boarder
  • ZARP VIP
  • Posts: 5775
  • Thanks received: 7911
  • Karma: -42
Last Edit: 4 years 9 months ago by Micky.
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: schnitzel nazi

[SSRP] Micky's Punishment Appeal 4 years 9 months ago #1196887

At least you ain't linking para's penis
  • TimeForPug
  • TimeForPug's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Adept Boarder
  • ZARP VIP Golden Blue Badge
  • Posts: 6768
  • Thanks received: 1212
  • Karma: -15
The topic has been locked.

[SSRP] Micky's Punishment Appeal 4 years 9 months ago #1196891

Tamaninja wrote:
sorIe wrote:
cancer rule cancer community
you forgot the 3rd cancer
eipus
  • SorIe
  • SorIe's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Marvelous Boarder
  • ZARP VIP Golden Blue Badge
  • Posts: 10840
  • Thanks received: 4296
  • Karma: 400

ex-dog LT member on many servers

The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Sam the Sausage

[SSRP] Micky's Punishment Appeal 4 years 9 months ago #1196892

Sally wrote:
EMP wrote:
How do you noobs always confuse this. Its really clear you can’t discuss members with a terms of service ban. It says discussion of Users with a terms of service ban, it does not say discussion of the users ban as discussion of the ban is forbidden because to talk about the ban you would talk about the user. Morgan made a thread a while back about this and it was pretty clear how it works. Mentioning their name is not the same as initiating a discussion about them.
zarpgaming.com/index.php/forum/general-d...nfusion?limitstart=0
If we're to go off of English, I think everyone is misunderstanding the rule.
If you look at the TOU, it is written as though the word "discussion" is part of the list due to a comma coming after profane, if we're to have it so that discussion was not part of the list, it should be written as "and profane discussion...". This would make a lot more sense to everyone and this whole drama could've been avoided.

Anyways, if the word "discussion" is part of the list, it'd just give the other words in the list no meaning whatsoever.
Going off of this logic, I and many others have, I imagine that the reasoning behind the word "discussion" is placed at the end is to allow us to know that the list ends at the word profane and allow us to know that discussion is allowed, but just not anything violating the TOU, or at least this is what written English tells me.

If we're not allowed to discuss the user's ban, that'd be completely understandable, but if people are saying words like "Free Jusu", I wouldn't call that a discussion.

We did not talk about what Jusu did, why he did it, how he did it etc, I at most sent a screenshot of a joke we had, I don't see how this harms anyone or breaks TOU.
  • Micky
  • Micky's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Mythical Boarder
  • ZARP VIP
  • Posts: 5775
  • Thanks received: 7911
  • Karma: -42
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: schnitzel nazi

[SSRP] Micky's Punishment Appeal 4 years 9 months ago #1196896

:support:

Hard to give reasons for dumb rules so just say dumb things like "staff are right even when they are wrong" instead
  • Denis
  • Denis's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Diamond Boarder
  • ZARP VIP
  • Posts: 2812
  • Thanks received: 1365
  • Karma: -49
The topic has been locked.

[SSRP] Micky's Punishment Appeal 4 years 9 months ago #1196899

its micky so hes automatically in the wrong and imo just get rid of him
  • Zarp Trusted
  • Zarp Trusted's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Banned
  • ZARP VIP
  • its mango
  • Posts: 2032
  • Thanks received: 847
  • Karma: -20
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: A Good Pianist

Micky's Punishment Appeal 4 years 9 months ago #1196900

Micky wrote:
Clarky wrote:
Markus Chellwigg wrote:
Clarky wrote:
Markus Chellwigg wrote:
Clarky wrote:
I shouldn't have to repeat myself but I'll say it again, the staff's word is final because things was getting way out of hand and you disregarded what I said completely
The staff word may be final, but when what the staff member is saying is a bullshit message that has no grounds normally, they should be able to speak up against it. The fact you all use "staff word is final" as an excuse shows that your argument is flawed and you're using it to save face.
Even if my argument was flawed, the matter of the fact is that i requested for what was being said to be stopped but it wasn’t stopped so what could I realistically do at that point? I’ve been told this was the right thing to do as well so I’m not in the wrong for this according to others including myself but you can think otherwise which is fine
So you are admitting that even when staff members are wrong, theyre right because their word is final? Okay buddy.
Not only this, what about that whole incident a while ago involving morgan where it was AGREED that simply mentioning cm banned members names is fine. Care to explain?
I'm fine when it comes to mentioning a CM banned member normally but there's an extent to where it becomes out of control and that is why I asked twice for it to be stopped but was ignored
Besides Micky can give me a message on TS and I'll be more than happy to discuss it on there with him so it will give him a better understanding since this situation can be resolved within minutes rather than rambling on the forums on who is right and wrong.
I'd rather this be public, it is not only I that requires a good reasoning behind these issues. Think of it as a more practical way of spreading the message to everyone affected and not just me.
I understand that, I meant actually having a voice discussion because it's so much better to get your reasoning across and in the outcome we will of course mention everything that was spoken about. Anyhow, I have been in touch with Richard and left him a message.
  • Clarky
  • Clarky's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Former Community Manager
  • ZARP VIP Gold Badge
  • I love Henny
  • Posts: 16826
  • Thanks received: 9584
  • Karma: 983
The topic has been locked.

Micky's Punishment Appeal 4 years 9 months ago #1196902

Clarky wrote:
Micky wrote:
Clarky wrote:
Markus Chellwigg wrote:
Clarky wrote:
Markus Chellwigg wrote:
Clarky wrote:
I shouldn't have to repeat myself but I'll say it again, the staff's word is final because things was getting way out of hand and you disregarded what I said completely
The staff word may be final, but when what the staff member is saying is a bullshit message that has no grounds normally, they should be able to speak up against it. The fact you all use "staff word is final" as an excuse shows that your argument is flawed and you're using it to save face.
Even if my argument was flawed, the matter of the fact is that i requested for what was being said to be stopped but it wasn’t stopped so what could I realistically do at that point? I’ve been told this was the right thing to do as well so I’m not in the wrong for this according to others including myself but you can think otherwise which is fine
So you are admitting that even when staff members are wrong, theyre right because their word is final? Okay buddy.
Not only this, what about that whole incident a while ago involving morgan where it was AGREED that simply mentioning cm banned members names is fine. Care to explain?
I'm fine when it comes to mentioning a CM banned member normally but there's an extent to where it becomes out of control and that is why I asked twice for it to be stopped but was ignored
Besides Micky can give me a message on TS and I'll be more than happy to discuss it on there with him so it will give him a better understanding since this situation can be resolved within minutes rather than rambling on the forums on who is right and wrong.
I'd rather this be public, it is not only I that requires a good reasoning behind these issues. Think of it as a more practical way of spreading the message to everyone affected and not just me.
I understand that, I meant actually having a voice discussion because it's so much better to get your reasoning across and in the outcome we will of course mention everything that was spoken about. Anyhow, I have been in touch with Richard and left him a message.
It's much easier to remember what you're saying as well as having a point of reference in written form, but to be fair I can see how the rule works for and against you due to how it was written.
  • Micky
  • Micky's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Mythical Boarder
  • ZARP VIP
  • Posts: 5775
  • Thanks received: 7911
  • Karma: -42
The topic has been locked.
The following user(s) said Thank You: schnitzel nazi

Micky's Punishment Appeal 4 years 9 months ago #1196904

Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ]

The main concern for me was that you ignored two of my verbal warnings in OOC to those who kept the discussion going on because it was starting to get out of hand IMO, which in the SSRP rules you should listen to the staff's final word. Sure you might've missed those messages or ignored them, but that is mainly why I handed out the punishment because I don't really punish people for this sort of stuff at all and always tried to defuse the discussion or whatever is going on before handing out mutes and what not.
  • Clarky
  • Clarky's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Former Community Manager
  • ZARP VIP Gold Badge
  • I love Henny
  • Posts: 16826
  • Thanks received: 9584
  • Karma: 983
The topic has been locked.
Time to create page: 0.164 seconds

130 PLAYERS ONLINE

Connect to server View Gametracker DarkRP 1
8/127
online
Connect to server View Gametracker Deathrun
0/40
online
Connect to server View Gametracker TTT
0/47
online
Connect to server View Gametracker Bhop
1/32
online
Connect to server View Gametracker Surf
0/32
online
Connect to server View Gametracker Prop Hunt
0/42
online
Connect to server View Gametracker Sandbox
0/42
online
Connect to server Discord
121/910
online
Top