Sally wrote:
EMP wrote:
How do you noobs always confuse this. Its really clear you can’t discuss members with a terms of service ban. It says discussion of Users with a terms of service ban, it does not say discussion of the users ban as discussion of the ban is forbidden because to talk about the ban you would talk about the user. Morgan made a thread a while back about this and it was pretty clear how it works. Mentioning their name is not the same as initiating a discussion about them.
zarpgaming.com/index.php/forum/general-d...nfusion?limitstart=0 If we're to go off of English, I think everyone is misunderstanding the rule.
If you look at the TOU, it is written as though the word "discussion" is part of the list due to a comma coming after profane, if we're to have it so that discussion was not part of the list, it should be written as "and profane discussion...". This would make a lot more sense to everyone and this whole drama could've been avoided.
Anyways, if the word "discussion" is part of the list, it'd just give the other words in the list no meaning whatsoever.
Going off of this logic, I and many others have, I imagine that the reasoning behind the word "discussion" is placed at the end is to allow us to know that the list ends at the word profane and allow us to know that discussion is allowed, but just not anything violating the TOU, or at least this is what written English tells me.
If we're not allowed to discuss the user's ban, that'd be completely understandable, but if people are saying words like "Free Jusu", I wouldn't call that a discussion.
We did not talk about what Jusu did, why he did it, how he did it etc, I at most sent a screenshot of a joke we had, I don't see how this harms anyone or breaks TOU.