TOPIC: [ACCEPTED] Lord Hoppel + Lord Baumann

Hi,

Name -
Lord Hoppel + Lord Baumann

STEAM-ID -
Lord Baumann: STEAM_0:1:46769843
Lord Hoppel: STEAM_0:1:27785850

Admins name - we dont know

Reason -
maybe because some admins only listen to 50 % of the persons that are involved in something like this + they randomly ban with knowing the half of the story?

Story -

[s:1ydlf2lf]Follow the template please.[/s:1ydlf2lf]

i mean i can understand that you banned Baumann because he propblocked but I didnt spawn ANY prop at that time...

it's just unfair that i get banned for someone elses cost or just get banned and other people that propkill and RDM the time before is just more than retarded and it's also unfair that they dont get anything even though they started the whole show with propkilling us with these brown couches



if it's possible just take a look at the logs and look if i spawned some of these props... you will find nothing...these 3 guys in the video from the ban request topic by wolf RDMed + Propkilled us the whole time


edit: the logs will show you that i didnt spawn any prop to block anything so this is AT LEAST for ME a good reason to get rid off this ban in my opinion + it's totally unfair AND not competent that people that didnt even check the logs supported the ban request

No one responded so I have changed it to + Support.

+ Support

Elmer J fap wrote:

no screenshots is correct....check the logs and you'll see that i didnt spawn anything + i wasnt even shown in the video in the ban request


so i cant regret anything because there was nothing except that Lord Baumann is a friend

Get proof that you didn't particiapate in this.

Actually. It is the admins job to provide proof here.

Since none have taken responsibility +support

Scottie wrote:
Indeed, +Support.

It's pretty hard to prove that you didn't do anything.

thesamon wrote:
it's also a fact that im not seen in the video + i did not spawn anything at or before the time the video was made

the only fact is that Lord Baumann is just a friend...

Lord Hoppel wrote:
I don't like you. You have shown no remorse nor regret in your appeal. And realistically, you shouldn't be unbanned.

However: no admin took responsibility for his deed and has delivered no proof.

This player should be unbanned at once.

Scottie wrote:

what shall i regret? i mean i regret that i was banned once for breaking NLR and so on ..but that's a different story besides it's a closed case...everything was fine..

i cant regret anything here because i cant regret that i have a friend that is (im sorry for that description for him) too stupid not to know that propblocking is wrong EVEN if he does it as an act in the heat of the moment


im sorry that i am so rough with my words..but that's kind of a part of my personality...it's not even an offense against all of you

Why is the '' Subject '' Lord hoppel and Lord Baumann? Baumann wont be unbanned since there is proof of him breaking rules.

I will talk with Agent About you later on the Admin Meeting. You will get out decision later on.

Zeroxjeppe wrote:
Sometimes you will have to decide stuff by your self. You are an admin after all, and you were the one who banned him, but he didn't break any rules and wasn't even a part of the video in you proofs, and were banned only because you put his name on your request, use common sense.

I wasn't involved in this. I banned them couse someone Accepted if , Agent Or Fellan and they weren't online so i did it for them.

But i will talk with them on the Admin meeting and we'll decide.

Zeroxjeppe wrote:
But he weren't suppose to be banned anyways, and un-banning him is the right thing to do here; Lord Baumann)deserves the ban, but Lord Hoppel didn't do anything wrong, so why should he suffer?

Konth wrote:
Indeed. Unless you can provide proof of either of them Zerox?

Still here scott? Im impressed.

Zeroxjeppe wrote:
Hes going after tonight, bit of a abrupt question.

Elmer J fap... I knew your name sounded familliar!