TOPIC: [FORUMS] Akemi&Anna's Official Warning appeal

Name - Akemi & Anna

Staff Members Name - Uhh... forums staff team?
Punishment Reason - "Not doing job" - AKA having a low post count
Server - Forums
Story/Situation -
What happened > I got an official for the reason above, nothing more to be said.

Story
So yeah. Gonna write a huge piece of text? No, just gonna write down what's relevant to me.
As I can see it as far as the forum goes, there's a single way to check who has done stuff and who has not, that's by post count.

So yeah, I'll explain some simple stuff.
First of all I got work, simple enough. I can't just go on my phone to check the forums 24/7 That's legit impossible at this time, "is this forever?" No, it's not, it's temporary as it's work that I have to do for school to finish my current year, then after that, I will once again have more time. (Yes it's an actual job)

Second I DONT SHITPOST Yeah, that's legit the 2nd point. I DO NOT SHITPOST (at least not much) 75%ish? Of my posts are posts that are either very long and or super contructive posts on the topic at hand. I don't post much but my posts are at least longer than the average "5-word shitposts". Just because I don't do this
This is an example of Onion shitpostingNot saying he's not being constructive at times.
[DISCLAIMER]The point of these screenshots are to proof that he does get his postcount (AKA Does his job) by shitposting
... Yeah just because I don't do that, doesn't mean I don't do my job.
I do almost EVERYTHING that I'm asked to do, (if this is right to do) and just because I don't shitpost that would mean I'd have to get demoted? I surely hope not because if that'st he case that would be pure bull****.

And to come back at a final point "I was gonna bring you up for an demotion" ~Onion, this was a bit ago.
The following (at least something similair) was said "I don't see you doing much on the forums". But there's a good reason for that, YOU DO NOT SEE someone locking topics, you don't see "locked by ..........." I don't see you doing much either except for shitposting, replying to apps, posting outcomes, and being constructive every once in a while.
And sure you may use the argument "but he replies to apps and posts outcomes"
Guess what? So do I, I reply to PH apps, I even posted the outcome for it this week. And I do make constructive posts. The only difference? I don't shitpost.

I think this warning should not be given and should be removed, and by that I end my case.

Extra Information - Anything you would find relevant to your warning(s)?
I don't think it would be a smart choice to demote someone who has to moderate stuff, for not posting a lot.
I read almost everything, I do whatever is asked of me. But that's sadly not proveable by any existing system, at least not to my knowledge.


Final notice - Something I'd like to share with you guys as a last word
I'm not trying to be rude to anyone, or come over childish, I'd rather give my points straight and not go around the bush.
If you do find it offencive I'm sorry, but it's me just being straight forward.

I was informed that out of all of the 50 most recent forum bans, none of them were yours. When we ban 10 people+ per day on the forums and none of them in the past 50 were yours, it throws up some red flags as to whether you're doing your job efficiently on the forums.

Im famous! anyways on topic, If there is a way to check who locks post, or deletes they should check. but I find this true, as you can moderate the forums without posting?

Morgan wrote:
5 days? FUCK AKEMI YOU'RE SO INACTIVE!!!!

You’ve done a lot of things at my request on the forums lately, I wasn’t there when this was voted on, but I would have vouched for you if I had been there. Forums is one of the places where I do see you doing your job well, even if that doesn’t include banning all the spam bots (either because someone else gets there first, timezones, availability when the bots are around most, etc). I don’t really think an official was needed here.

So to be a forum staff you need to post and ban people instead of just moderating and editing topics where appropriate?

MyNameBrokeTOU wrote:
That's what I was thinking, I guess if forum staff don't chuck out random punishments then that means they're inactive?

I said during the meeting that I wanted proof of your inactivity before voting on this. No proof was provided, although it is a fact that you haven't banned anyone recently (I double checked that myself).

Can i ask, why was onion used as an example......

Anon_Gaming wrote:
World's Most Wanted Shitposter

CrankyBot wrote:
Me and OnionRings are partners in crime.

Anon_Gaming wrote: You can ask, and there's a few reasons
1) He came to mind very quickly
2) He was the one who raised the demotion, so it felt right as an example.
3) He does the things I do
> replying to apps
> replying constructively at times
> posting outcome(s)
I just don't shitpost. (a lot)

Morgan wrote: As Xnator pointed out, I do do my job. I don't, however, ban a lot, what I often choose to do instead is to REMOVE the topics/comments that are breaking TOU, I'm not a very harsh person and never really see someone repost a comment I deleted. And for the spam bots (whatever you wanna call em), I didn't see many of them due to me being at work a lot, which is (like I mentioned before) temporary.
Raeker wrote: Fair enough, not many bans. But just because I don't ban on first TOU break (Overexadurated) and because I don't manage to scoop out bots as much as I used to due to a limited amount of time per day, doesn't mean I don't do the other things a moderator should do.

CrankyBot wrote:
Thats ace lol, his shitpost count is 10x higher than onions lol

When you always forget the end of the month meetings...

You don't have to post you have to moderator lime move posts posts and stuff and that you do

You don't have to post to do it you just look over the forums and see if everything is in order
Again i just feel like they are targeting Akemi & Anna...

Really wasn't needed, you do a lot on the forums and helped me out recently by clearing up stupid replies on a post I made. This shows you are actually active on the forums and that it is irrelevanf as to what your post count is.

Why hasnt this been locked if there is a new one?

Nick0GR wrote: There is one for her Forums official and one for her Teamspeak demotion - they are entirely seperate appeals that will have to be voted on in different meetings.

Raeker wrote: I’m sure he knows I mean he put an applications in for appeals..... lol