Login to ZARP

TOPIC: slay without a reason

slay without a reason 6 years 11 months ago #985560

The moderator KingOfTheDed slayed me for rdm because in front of me where two guys fighting and i killed the traitor	Lukas.RO Offline Fresh Boarder Posts: 2 Thanks received: 1 Karma: 0
Login or register to post a reply. The following user(s) said Thank You: dadoplayerDEV

slay without a reason 6 years 11 months ago #985563

2.5 Player Versus Player
If two individuals are fighting and you have no proof which could be the traitor, you must wait before joining in the fight until one player dies and they either; identify the body/the round ends/you question them.

Miia
Offline
Expert Boarder
Ex-TTT Super Admin
Posts: 1302
Thanks received: 810
Karma: 3

My Steam

Login or register to post a reply.

The following user(s) said Thank You: Aek177, KingOfTheDed

slay without a reason 6 years 11 months ago #985566

Miia wrote: 2.5 Player Versus Player If two individuals are fighting and you have no proof which could be the traitor, you must wait before joining in the fight until one player dies and they either; identify the body/the round ends/you question them. But a slay wasn’t needed, he could have gotten a verbal since he still got the Traitor.	Agebt Offline Gold Boarder MAN WHAT?! Posts: 2194 Thanks received: 984 Karma: 10
Propane#4246 Steam Last Edit: 6 years 11 months ago by Agebt. Login or register to post a reply.

slay without a reason 6 years 11 months ago #985568

So are you reporting King or making an appeal?	Aek177 Offline Legendary Member ★Ex TTT SO★Ex TS3 HA★Ex Global Moderator★ Posts: 2278 Thanks received: 846 Karma: 56
Login or register to post a reply.

slay without a reason 6 years 11 months ago #985571

Agent 55 wrote:

Miia wrote:

2.5 Player Versus Player
If two individuals are fighting and you have no proof which could be the traitor, you must wait before joining in the fight until one player dies and they either; identify the body/the round ends/you question them.

But a slay wasn’t needed, he could have gotten a verbal since he still got the Traitor.

A slay was needed here. The outcome of a situation like this should not depend on the role of the player they RDMed.

Miia
Offline
Expert Boarder
Ex-TTT Super Admin
Posts: 1302
Thanks received: 810
Karma: 3

My Steam

Login or register to post a reply.

The following user(s) said Thank You: KingOfTheDed

slay without a reason 6 years 11 months ago #985572

Miia wrote:

Agent 55 wrote:

Miia wrote:

2.5 Player Versus Player
If two individuals are fighting and you have no proof which could be the traitor, you must wait before joining in the fight until one player dies and they either; identify the body/the round ends/you question them.

But a slay wasn’t needed, he could have gotten a verbal since he still got the Traitor.

A slay was needed here. The outcome of a situation like this should not depend on the role of the player they RDMed.

I don’t know what his rapsheet looks like but a verbal would have been better.

Agebt
Offline
Gold Boarder
MAN WHAT?!
Posts: 2194
Thanks received: 984
Karma: 10

Propane#4246

Steam

Last Edit: 6 years 11 months ago by Agebt.

Login or register to post a reply.

slay without a reason 6 years 11 months ago #985658

Agent 55 wrote:

Miia wrote:

Agent 55 wrote:

Miia wrote:

2.5 Player Versus Player
If two individuals are fighting and you have no proof which could be the traitor, you must wait before joining in the fight until one player dies and they either; identify the body/the round ends/you question them.

But a slay wasn’t needed, he could have gotten a verbal since he still got the Traitor.

A slay was needed here. The outcome of a situation like this should not depend on the role of the player they RDMed.

I don’t know what his rapsheet looks like but a verbal would have been better.

Sometimes a verbal is better just explain the rule they broke because for many people the dont join gunfights rule dosen't make much sense. But your argument that the punishment should change based on the role of the player they killed is incorrect, its still breaking the rule. The person that shot first could have a reason to do so.