Agent 55 wrote:
Miia wrote:
Agent 55 wrote:
Miia wrote:
2.5 Player Versus Player
If two individuals are fighting and you have no proof which could be the traitor, you must wait before joining in the fight until one player dies and they either; identify the body/the round ends/you question them.
But a slay wasn’t needed, he could have gotten a verbal since he still got the Traitor.
A slay was needed here. The outcome of a situation like this should not depend on the role of the player they RDMed.
I don’t know what his rapsheet looks like but a verbal would have been better.
Sometimes a verbal is better just explain the rule they broke because for many people the dont join gunfights rule dosen't make much sense. But your argument that the punishment should change based on the role of the player they killed is incorrect, its still breaking the rule. The person that shot first could have a reason to do so.