TOPIC: @Richard @SSRP Staffs

this guy got banned for having 3 recents + rdm
(FAdmin) Dr Richard (STEAM_0:0:79280795) Banned |B| Sexy SL1CK (STEAM_0:1:156333246) (1 day(s), 12 hour(s)) (3 Recent Punishments + 2.2 RDM [Attempt to rip suit] )
i dont think this ban is needed ? he had 3 recents not 6 ? how ever i dont know if he had ban recents
i think you need to take another look though !

Check Eddie's last topic, it was clearly RDM just to try ripping a suit and 3 recents is a lot imo

GamingTroll wrote: even its a suit it doesn't change the rule ? it stay as a warn ??
also 3 recents isn't that much though

Bad players like him deserve banning as he failed to gluon a nano (a 1 hit suit) not once BUT TWICE

Mr Red X wrote: It’s his intent behind the act, and even on the post he asked to be banned, Richard did nothing wrong here

Kyber wrote: aight thanks
this can be locked

to be fair I know what I did was wrong and I already made an apology post but I wasn't expecting a ban for it

Sexy SL1CK wrote: yeah well, we don't give a shit ngl


well done richard, I would've given him 3 and a half days ban if I were you, you remember that 5 recents = 1 week, 10 recents = 2 weeks, and aftewards it's hell, just divide as you do!

Sexy SL1CK wrote:
You say this, but you're just going to do it again.

In my opinion, this guy deserved a time out, one and a half day is nothing compared to what i should have given him, he needs to understand/realize that destroying something a person worked hard for is simply, malicious.

And why are you here complaining about how i do my job, if he considers the punishment false, he will make an appeal himself, he doesn't need a lawyer.

And i'm 100% certain that you are in no position to tell me how to do my job. Just look at this stupidity below.

Dr Richard wrote: do you know what that guy did ? no

Mr Red X wrote: What’s the point in lowering a ban to 5 years though?

Dr Richard wrote: what are you on about how can anything you do on a game be considered malicious. its some pixels that you can get back in a day. you cant handle criticism and you commenting on redx' job when you are one of the worst admins that doesn't know how to handle 90% of situations. this man had 4 recents and you banned him, which is too harsh. fucking hypocrite

Kyber wrote: the guy wanted his ban lowered at least, me and jax were nice and decided to do that

Mr Red X wrote: It’s really not being nice though, the community most probably won’t be around in 5 years as gmod itself is dying out, just being a bit cruel to be honest rather than simply denying it

Kyber wrote: ok so that guy was a complete cunt, redx made the right decision and everyone on ttt supported his opinion. when you are banned you are no longer protected by the staff ethos so redx could of made it a 100year ban and it would still be valid and fair.

Kyber wrote: and thats why i told him to improve his attitude and play other zarp servers

Warren wrote:
This is so sad, watching you going totally hysteric just because you broke our compromise and got perma banned again.

Dr Richard wrote: I'm sorry warren lad, but people play the game to have fun, not ruin other people's experience, it's very obvious you're too dull to get that, but at least there are some good staff members that keep to this idea, such as richard, lucious, oxyfoxy, etc.Mr Red X wrote: yeah no you're a hypocrite and it's more obvious than a dinosaur in a plain field

Dr Richard wrote: what the fuck on you on about sir, yet again you cant handle criticism so you try to find something to say about the other person lmao. stay on topic mate
this is so sad alexa play despacito