Hey, just read over your application and I noticed an area you should improve on:
Dark Matter wrote:
You should not just handle an RDM report only by asking for evidence and if there isn't, you'd end the sit. You should gather their stories of the situation that encountered between them and summarise what had happened between the players and find what rule had been broken. If the stories conflicted against each other, you would then need to request for evidence and if there isn't any, that's when it would be okay to end of the sit. If there was evidence, the user should give you it with the rulebreaker's STEAMID proof too, to avoid framing.

Improve on this part and you'll have my support, keep everything up, good luck!

Hey, just read over your application and I noticed an area you should improve on: [quote="Dark Matter" post=706519][i]Player x accuses player y for RDMing him, the console log shows that player y killed player x.[/i] Player X accuses player Y of RDM so I would ask if player Y had any evidence against this and if not I would check his recents and if he doesnt have any warn him verbally and warn him if he does.[/quote] You should not just handle an RDM report only by asking for evidence and if there isn't, you'd end the sit. You should gather their stories of the situation that encountered between them and summarise what had happened between the players and find what rule had been broken. If the stories conflicted against each other, you would then need to request for evidence and if there isn't any, that's when it would be okay to end of the sit. If there was evidence, the user should give you it with the rulebreaker's STEAMID proof too, to avoid framing. Improve on this part and you'll have my support, keep everything up, good luck!