I believe the following report was handled improperly because of a misintepretation of the rules:
zarpgaming.com/index.php/forum/report-ab...-speaking-to-request

In this report, the staff member was reported for building three props in a base. All three props were placed down to block a camera. He placed it one prop at a time, as his prop kept getting destroyed.

In the end, the user decided to report he staff member to clarify the rule. The report was denied by Ace as, according to him, no rule was broken.

Personally, I disagree.

Now allow me to firstly explain why Ace denied it: according to him, the rule doesn't say that you aren't allowed to place another prop if it has been removed.

However, that is extremely abusable. For example, say I raid a base that has three cameras in three different areas. Where these areas are doesn't really matter, just understand that all three cameras are part of the base.

As I start the raid I first block the first camera. When I pass that area, I quickly undo my prop and place a new one down for the next area. Then after that I undo it again and place another prop down to block the third and final camera.

According to Ace's - and many others' - logic I did not break any rules, as the props weren't down at the same time.

I believe rule 5.6 should not be intepreted as "You're allowed to have one prop down at the same time to block a camera" but as "You are only allowed to place down a single prop to block a camera". To clarify, this is what the rule states:

The prop was already placed down, but destroyed. The rule only states that you may place a single prop. That single prop was already placed, so a rule was definitely broken if you place another two.

If a community manager or any lead team in general could look at this, that would be great. Thank you for your time.

I believe the following report was handled improperly because of a misintepretation of the rules: http://zarpgaming.com/index.php/forum/report-abuse/97929-ssrp-gmod-speaking-to-request In this report, the staff member was reported for building three props in a base. All three props were placed down to block a camera. He placed it one prop at a time, as his prop kept getting destroyed. In the end, the user decided to report he staff member to clarify the rule. The report was denied by Ace as, according to him, no rule was broken. [b]Personally, I disagree.[/b] Now allow me to firstly explain why Ace denied it: according to him, the rule doesn't say that you aren't allowed to place another prop if it has been removed. However, that is extremely abusable. For example, say I raid a base that has three cameras in three different areas. Where these areas are doesn't really matter, just understand that all three cameras are part of the base. As I start the raid I first block the first camera. When I pass that area, I quickly undo my prop and place a new one down for the next area. Then after that I undo it again and place another prop down to block the third and final camera. According to Ace's - and many others' - logic I did not break any rules, as the props weren't down at the same time. I believe rule 5.6 should not be intepreted as "You're allowed to have one prop down at the same time to block a camera" but as "You are only allowed to place down a single prop to block a camera". To clarify, this is what the rule states: [quote]5.6 Building - Building or rebuilding during a raid is not allowed. Any repairs must be done once the raid has ended. A single prop may be placed during a raid in order to block a camera but this should be removed once the raid has ended.[/quote] The prop was already placed down, but destroyed. The rule only states that you may place a single prop. That single prop was already placed, so a rule was definitely broken if you place another two. If a community manager or any lead team in general could look at this, that would be great. Thank you for your time.