AyyLookItzGmad wrote:
Threatening a ban for harassment when not wanting to be harassed on the teamspeak is valid. When bringing someone up for a punishment, you make a case against them, with solid proof. For everyone reading this, I never brought him up, after the conversations with Gmod conjoined with the current proof, I felt there wasn't enough evidence to do so. If there's enough solid proof in a case, the other player's proof surely has no impact otherwise the validity of the reporter is no longer "solid". As you know, witnesses aren't proof so let's stop pretending like they are.

[quote="AyyLookItzGmad" post=702707]it was also about you threatening to ban me for harassment when 1. I was trying to prove a point. Also you being immsture and saying you were not going use my proof in the meeting because "i could be lying" I am joking about the mouse thing not the fact that you spread it amongst the community which a twamspeak head admin even sajd you joined the channel blurting it out in front of multiple people and even he didnt have to know as he isnt LT on SSRP.[/quote] Threatening a ban for harassment when not wanting to be harassed on the teamspeak is valid. When bringing someone up for a punishment, you make a case against them, with [b]solid[/b] proof. For everyone reading this, I never brought him up, after the conversations with Gmod conjoined with the current proof, I felt there wasn't enough evidence to do so. If there's enough solid proof in a case, the other player's proof surely has no impact otherwise the validity of the reporter is no longer "solid". As you know, witnesses aren't proof so let's stop pretending like they are.