ChummyXRay wrote:
Its one thing shooting someone by accident in the middle of a gun fight, while that's still crossfire its easily excusable but shooting an unarmed man that clearly isn't doing anything because you assume he's part of the base is a completely different thing.

If a player went up to an admin and shot them then I have a feeling they would get a swift warn.

[quote="ChummyXRay" post=680502][quote="Hamzah" post=680500][quote="ChummyXRay" post=680497][quote="Hamzah" post=680495][quote="ParaMontana" post=680490]That moment you are in the middle of A Combat zone and you complain that you get killed[/quote] Lmao ive never seen someonr so bias, if that was a user he wouldve been warned as crossfire is still rdm.[/quote] So bias? Are people here incapable of realizing the staff team is not a hive mind? Seems pretty apparent through Para's response that he would not warn someone for this, but others might in accordance with the rules.[/quote] Exactly and what is done with the people who fo the same? They get warned. And if they get warned and appeal it will simply be denied.[/quote] I'm guessing you don't exactly understand that bias is the incorrect word choice here. Staff can warn at their own discretion. Maybe you warn for crossfire RDM often, but I cannot remember the last time I did. So tired of people complaining staff are lazy and too loose then seeing people claim it's over the top and unfair.[/quote] Its one thing shooting someone by accident in the middle of a gun fight, while that's still crossfire its easily excusable but shooting an unarmed man that clearly isn't doing anything because you assume he's part of the base is a completely different thing. If a player went up to an admin and shot them then I have a feeling they would get a swift warn.