Forum

Login to ZARP

Forum

[IMPORTANT] TTT Staff read this

View BBCode Back »

Raeker wrote:

CrankyBot wrote:

Raeker wrote:

CrankyBot wrote:

sorle wrote:

CrankyBot wrote:

In the damagelogs it will tell us if someone has retrieved DNA from a body (e.g. Detective has retrieved the DNA of Traitor from Innocent's Body)

Yep, I know that, but it can't simply be used as a reason to KOS.

Oh I see what you meant

Yes I do agree but I see flaws in that .

What do you mean "you see flaws in that"? It's a rule, something you're supposed to be familiar with (especially if you go for SA)

What I meant was interrogating the UIQ (user in question).

If the detective doesn't have a mic and he's typing to the UIQ - if they are a traitor then the traitor can see that the detective doesn't have a mic and then guns him down. Or if the UIQ is innocent and the interrogation is in progress a traitor can be doing something (e.g. killing lots others) or just straight up killing both of them by surprise.

Not that the flaw I'm implying can be seen as a major issue, but for those without a mic can find interrogation via text can be... problematic

Basically you're saying that users without a mic have a disadvantage over users with a mic, but that has always been the case and will forever be the case. It's a rule, and a very important rule at that.

I'm not disagreeing with the rule or degrading the rule - I agree staff must take into consideration that D's (or innocents with DNA scanners in some cases) should be asking questions as to why they killed someone.
Yes the problem for no-mic users is always an issue.
I just seeing one negative side to this, again this is no way of me saying that this rule is stupid or shouldn't be followed.

BBCode

[quote="Raeker" post=679863][quote="CrankyBot" post=679859][quote="Raeker" post=679855][quote="CrankyBot" post=679848][quote="sorle" post=679812][quote="CrankyBot" post=679810]In the damagelogs it will tell us if someone has retrieved DNA from a body (e.g. Detective has retrieved the DNA of Traitor from Innocent's Body)[/quote]
Yep, I know that, but it can't simply be used as a reason to KOS.[/quote]

Oh I see what you meant

Yes I do agree but I see flaws in that .[/quote]
What do you mean "you see flaws in that"? It's a rule, something you're supposed to be familiar with (especially if you go for SA)[/quote]

What I meant was interrogating the UIQ (user in question).

If the detective doesn't have a mic and he's typing to the UIQ - if they are a traitor then the traitor can see that the detective doesn't have a mic and then guns him down. Or if the UIQ is innocent and the interrogation is in progress a traitor can be doing something (e.g. killing lots others) or just straight up killing both of them by surprise.

Not that the flaw I'm implying can be seen as a major issue, but for those without a mic can find interrogation via text can be... problematic[/quote]
Basically you're saying that users without a mic have a disadvantage over users with a mic, but that has always been the case and will forever be the case. It's a rule, and a very important rule at that.[/quote]

I'm not disagreeing with the rule or degrading the rule - I agree staff must take into consideration that D's (or innocents with DNA scanners in some cases) should be asking questions as to why they killed someone.
Yes the problem for no-mic users is always an issue. 
I just seeing one negative side to this, again this is no way of me saying that this rule is stupid or shouldn't be followed.

Forum

[IMPORTANT] TTT Staff read this

View BBCode Back »

BBCode

Quick Menu

Menu

205 PLAYERS ONLINE

ZARP Discord & Steam Group