Your whole reason for slaying and warning me up to that point was: I was walking next to a T that killed 3 people around me.

You just COMPLETELY demolished your initial and only claims backing your punishment decision: The T killed me 20seconds after you saw me next to him, and the logs say that you lied when your whole claim was that I was at the scene of 3 murders.

Now that you destroyed what the punishment is based on, you come up with a story about head movements, and something obscure about minecarts THAT YOU NEVER MENTIONED BEFORE noticing your mistakes. (I think you just found out about him killing me and that if you had done your homework THERE and THEN, you wouldn't have went on with your on-the-spot decision to tag me as a teamer)
I never teamed in my life, that T killed me. I wouldn't dispute something I'm guilty, let alone this long.

I WAS INDEED AFK FOR MINUTES ON before joining back and getting slayed, so me saying I was afk and having no recollection of any action of the round before is COMPLETELY TRUE: i just figured the action you were talking about must have happened during a round that STARTED and ENDED while I was away. Instead it seems I went AFK AFTER the litigious action, which is even more ridiculous because I've been playing for a while and I can't see myself in a situation where I could be mistaken for a teamer. I love to kill T's. I really can't put my finger on whatever led you to your gross misinterpretation at best or at worse your weird way of getting at someone because you got killed and were mad.

Let's imagine you're not coming up with a fabrication to patch up your story after you realized your mistake through the logs: I can come up to anyone and have a one-time interaction with them, that doesn't mean I know they're a T and I'm in a secret team with them. Slaying and Warning me is way out of line, even if you misinterpreted the situation.

I think that this calls for sanctions, because that's proof of a false initial justification AT LEAST.

Your whole reason for slaying and warning me up to that point was: I was walking next to a T that killed 3 people around me. You just COMPLETELY demolished your initial and only claims backing your punishment decision: The T killed me 20seconds after you saw me next to him, and the logs say that you lied when your whole claim was that I was at the scene of 3 murders. Now that you destroyed what the punishment is based on, you come up with a story about head movements, and something obscure about minecarts THAT YOU NEVER MENTIONED BEFORE noticing your mistakes. (I think you just found out about him killing me and that if you had done your homework THERE and THEN, you wouldn't have went on with your on-the-spot decision to tag me as a teamer) I never teamed in my life, that T killed me. I wouldn't dispute something I'm guilty, let alone this long. I WAS INDEED AFK FOR MINUTES ON before joining back and getting slayed, so me saying I was afk and having no recollection of any action of the round before is COMPLETELY TRUE: i just figured the action you were talking about must have happened during a round that STARTED and ENDED while I was away. Instead it seems I went AFK AFTER the litigious action, which is even more ridiculous because I've been playing for a while and I can't see myself in a situation where I could be mistaken for a teamer. I love to kill T's. I really can't put my finger on whatever led you to your gross misinterpretation at best or at worse your weird way of getting at someone because you got killed and were mad. Let's imagine you're not coming up with a fabrication to patch up your story after you realized your mistake through the logs: I can come up to anyone and have a one-time interaction with them, that doesn't mean I know they're a T and I'm in a secret team with them. Slaying and Warning me is way out of line, even if you misinterpreted the situation. I think that this calls for sanctions, because that's proof of a false initial justification AT LEAST.