No I don't have a video of me being afk.
Doesn't the server run an afk tracker? Since afks are automatically put in spectator mode after a while, surely my inactivity left a trace somewhere?

At any rate, wouldn't it be more sound and logical regarding the structural integrity of your Justice system, for the author of a controversial punishment to produce a proof of guilt, instead of the victim of the abuse having to produce the proof of their innocence??

EDIT: I understand you're asking for a proof of the abuse happening, and I can only guide you to the logs, where it should show I didn't move, buy, shoot, basically do anything the round before I got slayed (I was slayed 5secs in the next one). This could be proof for that.
What I'm also saying is HE doesn't have any proof for the punishment, and I think that that in itself should be grounds for at least lifting the warning and some sort of punishment coming his way, for not following the guidelines on slaying and warning a player for teaming.

No I don't have a video of me being afk. Doesn't the server run an afk tracker? Since afks are automatically put in spectator mode after a while, surely my inactivity left a trace somewhere? At any rate, wouldn't it be more sound and logical regarding the structural integrity of your Justice system, for the author of a controversial punishment to produce a proof of guilt, instead of the victim of the abuse having to produce the proof of their innocence?? EDIT: I understand you're asking for a proof of the abuse happening, and I can only guide you to the logs, where it should show I didn't move, buy, shoot, basically do anything the round before I got slayed (I was slayed 5secs in the next one). This could be proof for that. What I'm also saying is HE doesn't have any proof for the punishment, and I think that that in itself should be grounds for at least lifting the warning and some sort of punishment coming his way, for not following the guidelines on slaying and warning a player for teaming.