Like I already told you over Steam, the only thing that bothers me (although of course I would have appreciated it if TheXnator approached me first) is that Xnator probably didn't speak to Toto, although the Report Abuse policy clearly states that speaking to the staff member is a high priority when handling the report.
Although I would have appreciated it if Xnator asked me first, he didn't do anything wrong except (maybe, perhaps he did actually speak to Toto) not following the policy correctly. As I already told you, the policy doesn't state that if someone claims to handle it that nobody else is allowed to handle it anyway.
Besides, the outcome would have probably been the same. The only difference I can think of is that I would have said that the report was "Accepted," as Toto apparently didn't follow the Staff Ethos (even according to Xnator, who also said that Toto didn't follow the ethos correctly and would be reminded to always follow it).
However, as I didn't have the chance to speak to Toto about it it could just as well have been denied, depending on what Toto would have told me.
BBCode