Morgan wrote:
Surely it would be better to discuss the kills BEFORE warning the person, what if the staff member missed one part of the story and doesn't even let the guy explain himself, there's no point having a sit just for the sake of it, its meant to let him fight his case.

[quote="Morgan" post=594604][quote="Sorle" post=594597][quote="Morgan" post=594592]He told me he forgot that he didn't have a sit with you before the warning, so he made it right and had a sit with you. This doesn't seem necessary.[/quote] It entirely is, because the purpose of a sit is to discuss the situation BEFORE punishing, not after.[/quote] Yes, if you read carefully you'll see he made it right by doing it after the warning, he made it right and this isn't necessary.[/quote] Surely it would be better to discuss the kills BEFORE warning the person, what if the staff member missed one part of the story and doesn't even let the guy explain himself, there's no point having a sit just for the sake of it, its meant to let him fight his case.