This ban in goes against the ethos as people should be punished when there are others being affected in this case there were no others being affected.
I have spoken to onion and as he says this is still a rule break but I would highly advise against bans like this as it is a ban for the sake of a ban. It only affects the people being banned. If there was a complaint then I would fully agree with the ban but there wasn't complaints so I don't really understand why a ban was needed.
No further action will be taken
BBCode