There's this problem though: "2.4 Player Versus Player
If two individuals are fighting and you have no proof of which could be the traitor, you must wait before joining in the fight until one player dies and they either; identifies the body/round ends/question them."

There's room for validating my interpretation of the rule in this situation: I did have proof that the D was innocent, given the phrasing it isn't clear that I still was forbidden from taking a side.

There's this problem though: "2.4 Player Versus Player If two individuals are fighting and you have no proof of which could be the traitor, you must wait before joining in the fight until one player dies and they either; identifies the body/round ends/question them." There's room for validating my interpretation of the rule in this situation: I did have proof that the D was innocent, given the phrasing it isn't clear that I still was forbidden from taking a side.