- Forum
- Our Servers
-
Leaderboards
-
DarkRP
- DarkRP Gangs
- DarkRP Money Printed
- DarkRP Suit RIPs
- DarkRP Mayor Survival
- DarkRP Nuclear Launches
- DarkRP Bank Vault Raids
- DarkRP Bartender Tips
- DarkRP Air Drops
- DarkRP Casino Vault Raids
- DarkRP Drug Runs
- DarkRP Arena Events
- Police Armory Raids
- Bartender Customers Served
- Police RIPs
- DarkRP GENCoin Sold
- Surf Records
- BHOP Records
- Trouble in Terrorist Town
- Deathrun
- Prop Hunt
-
DarkRP
- Community
- Help
- Store
|
Login to ZARP
|
View BBCode Back »
I was denied due to recent warning and attitude last time, however the recent warning was removed and my attitude is still being worked on.
Details:
RP Name:
|WK| Sorle
Link to Steam Profile:
Click here.
SteamID:
STEAM_0:0:51990442
Current Gametracker Profiles:
Server 1
Server 2
Server 3
Estimated Server Time:
Around 1200 hours, I have too many Gametrackers to know exactly.
Languages I speak:
English, small amounts of French, and small amounts of Greek.
DarkRP related:
Explain "Random Deathmatch" and give an example scenario:
Explain "New Life Rule" and give an example scenario:
Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player X accuses Player Y of RDMing them, the console log shows that Player Y killed Player X.
Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player X accuses Player Y of breaking NLR, the kills are pretty close together in console (a few lines apart) at a peak time.
Why I should be chosen (we recommend around 150 words):
Essentially, for me, I'm in a cycle currently.
Get staff, resign a few weeks later, then minge around until I get banned.
This caused me to get community banned and lose any trust I had with the community.
However, I'm determined to break this cycle.
I'm aware my attitude can be a bit shaky at times, and so can my knowledge of the new rules. However, I can assure you, it's a work in progress that will be corrected very quickly. I have been staff in the past and have been applauded for the excellent manner in which I handled sits. I feel like I could continue handling sits in this exemplary manner, and since I am a Server 3 player, I can help staff an extremely understaffed server. With moderator, I feel like I will very swiftly correct the negatives I have and become an excellent addition to your staff team.
I am aware that currently, as it is, I react quite badly to unfavourable situations in which I feel like the wrong thing is done. However, this is the main point I will be improving with myself, as when this is corrected, it can allow me to correct much more about myself. I considered whether I should apply or not because of this, but I feel like this will be a learning experience which will allow me to improve my attitude by a large amount.
Thank you for reading.
Details:
RP Name:
|WK| Sorle
Link to Steam Profile:
Click here.
SteamID:
STEAM_0:0:51990442
Current Gametracker Profiles:
Server 1
Server 2
Server 3
Estimated Server Time:
Around 1200 hours, I have too many Gametrackers to know exactly.
Languages I speak:
English, small amounts of French, and small amounts of Greek.
DarkRP related:
Explain "Random Deathmatch" and give an example scenario:
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ]
Random Deathmatch, abbreviated to RDM, is when a player kills another player without a valid roleplay reason.
An example of this would be Player X walking up to Player Y and shooting him because he looked at him funny. This would be counted as RDM, as Player X did not have a valid reason to shoot Player Y.
An example of this would be Player X walking up to Player Y and shooting him because he looked at him funny. This would be counted as RDM, as Player X did not have a valid reason to shoot Player Y.
Explain "New Life Rule" and give an example scenario:
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ]
New Life Rule, abbreviated to NLR, is a rule which states that a player may not interact with a district in which they died until 3 minutes have passed since their death.
An example of this would be Player X raiding Player Y in the Bank District and killing Player Y, but Player Y comes back and snipes him from the Fountain District. This is counted as NLR because Player Y was interacting with the district. He would also be breaking NLR if he went directly to the Bank District after his death.
There are a handful of situations in which NLR does not apply:
An example of this would be Player X raiding Player Y in the Bank District and killing Player Y, but Player Y comes back and snipes him from the Fountain District. This is counted as NLR because Player Y was interacting with the district. He would also be breaking NLR if he went directly to the Bank District after his death.
There are a handful of situations in which NLR does not apply:
Using a Tactical Insertion Point to respawn in the same district you died in.
Someone reviving you with a Defibrillator.
You are a police officer and you are attempting to stop a Bank Raid/Nuclear Launch.
You are a police officer and you died in the PD District.
Someone reviving you with a Defibrillator.
You are a police officer and you are attempting to stop a Bank Raid/Nuclear Launch.
You are a police officer and you died in the PD District.
Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player X accuses Player Y of RDMing them, the console log shows that Player Y killed Player X.
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ]
In approaching this situation, there would be a few steps I would take first:
Once this is done, I would first explain Player X's side of the story to Player Y, then ask for theirs. I would weigh up both sides of the story, use the information provided to me in the logs, and come to a conclusion on what seems most logical. I would explain this conclusion to both parties and if either of them denied this, I would require proof. If Player X could not procure valid proof or Player Y procured counter-proof, I would be forced to end the situation and return each party to their original positions. If Player X procured valid proof or if Player Y admitted to RDMing Player X, I would speak to and warn Player Y, then return each party to their original positions.
Speak to the person who made the report briefly about the important details.
Check if either person is in a roleplay situation.
If not, teleport them both to a secluded area/roof.
Check if either person is in a roleplay situation.
If not, teleport them both to a secluded area/roof.
Once this is done, I would first explain Player X's side of the story to Player Y, then ask for theirs. I would weigh up both sides of the story, use the information provided to me in the logs, and come to a conclusion on what seems most logical. I would explain this conclusion to both parties and if either of them denied this, I would require proof. If Player X could not procure valid proof or Player Y procured counter-proof, I would be forced to end the situation and return each party to their original positions. If Player X procured valid proof or if Player Y admitted to RDMing Player X, I would speak to and warn Player Y, then return each party to their original positions.
Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player X accuses Player Y of breaking NLR, the kills are pretty close together in console (a few lines apart) at a peak time.
Warning: Spoiler! [ Click to expand ][ Click to hide ]
I would take the same first steps in handling the situation as the last one, however the rest would be relatively different. I would get both sides of the story, however I would base much more of my conclusion on the logs.
If I can clearly see that Player Y died in Bank District but came back a few seconds later and killed Player X and had no valid reason to do so (Tactical Insertion Point, Defib, Bank Raid/Nuke as Police), I can conclude that NLR was broken by Player Y and speak to/warn them. If Player Y states they had a valid reason to do so, I would require proof from Player X that there was no valid reason for Player Y to be "breaking NLR". If valid proof is shown of Player Y breaking NLR with no valid reason, I would warn Player Y and speak to them about lying in sits. If invalid/no proof is shown, then I would be forced to end the sit.
However, if Player X claimed that Player Y sniped them from another district, and the logs showed that Player Y killed Player X from another district, I would require proof that the rules were actually broken. If proof was procured and it appeared to be valid, I would speak to Player Y about how you're not allowed to go into or interact with a district you have NLR in. If they did not know this part of the rules, I would inform them of it and give them a verbal warning. If they clearly knew this part of the rule beforehand, I would warn them.
If I can clearly see that Player Y died in Bank District but came back a few seconds later and killed Player X and had no valid reason to do so (Tactical Insertion Point, Defib, Bank Raid/Nuke as Police), I can conclude that NLR was broken by Player Y and speak to/warn them. If Player Y states they had a valid reason to do so, I would require proof from Player X that there was no valid reason for Player Y to be "breaking NLR". If valid proof is shown of Player Y breaking NLR with no valid reason, I would warn Player Y and speak to them about lying in sits. If invalid/no proof is shown, then I would be forced to end the sit.
However, if Player X claimed that Player Y sniped them from another district, and the logs showed that Player Y killed Player X from another district, I would require proof that the rules were actually broken. If proof was procured and it appeared to be valid, I would speak to Player Y about how you're not allowed to go into or interact with a district you have NLR in. If they did not know this part of the rules, I would inform them of it and give them a verbal warning. If they clearly knew this part of the rule beforehand, I would warn them.
Why I should be chosen (we recommend around 150 words):
Essentially, for me, I'm in a cycle currently.
Get staff, resign a few weeks later, then minge around until I get banned.
This caused me to get community banned and lose any trust I had with the community.
However, I'm determined to break this cycle.
I'm aware my attitude can be a bit shaky at times, and so can my knowledge of the new rules. However, I can assure you, it's a work in progress that will be corrected very quickly. I have been staff in the past and have been applauded for the excellent manner in which I handled sits. I feel like I could continue handling sits in this exemplary manner, and since I am a Server 3 player, I can help staff an extremely understaffed server. With moderator, I feel like I will very swiftly correct the negatives I have and become an excellent addition to your staff team.
I am aware that currently, as it is, I react quite badly to unfavourable situations in which I feel like the wrong thing is done. However, this is the main point I will be improving with myself, as when this is corrected, it can allow me to correct much more about myself. I considered whether I should apply or not because of this, but I feel like this will be a learning experience which will allow me to improve my attitude by a large amount.
Thank you for reading.
BBCode
Time to create page: 0.074 seconds
151 PLAYERS ONLINE
DarkRP
9/127
Online
Deathrun
0/40
Online
TTT
0/47
Online
Bhop
0/32
Online
Surf
0/32
Online
Prop Hunt
0/42
Online
Sandbox
0/42
Online
Discord
142/964
Online