TBH in the first few minutes i had enough evidence from what is said from jenga alone to say no warning would be given for these reasons.
BOTH sides do not match
1 player is saying killed in base, OTHER is saying in bank.
2. logs can not be used as evidence for everything, as vital information is not supplied in them.
3. Logs stating the district as UNKNOWN, so you can not use that as evidence for which district it is.
I would also point out, jenga your handling of that sit near to middle through end was not the best.
you clearly stated at one point "You've had enough of his shit" well 1. that is something that is not needed to be said.
Further more, you had that sit going in that players base, which can lead to many issues, such as being killed in that sit, therefore the first thing you should have done was go to a roof.
on top of that, you clearly only wanted 1 person in that sit, and not ALL who where involved, and while watching it, I personally would have felt that you was going to be bias, and not attempt to warn the other player for NLR, however in my personal opinion, NO warn should have been given here, as not enough evidence was showed or supplied.
I would also like to point out that PM done in chat, no offence but, anything disrespectful in anyway shape or form, should NOT be on the server.
Oh also Jenga, how does "Unknown" mean, "You killed them in their base" ???
I never knew that was the definition of Unknown, i personally thought it meant, "Not knowing, OR not in the range of knowledge/strange".
BBCode