marijnishier wrote: How, in your right mind, could you EVER consider it attempted RDM? Let me get you the definition of attempt:


By his story, do you really think he was actively attempting to RDM him?

Also, you are allowed to use slams like this, so I don't know what you're talking about. It can be used for raids, or he might just want to get onto a roof for fun.

Michael shouldn't have got so close, as 0ctocat's intentions must've been clear enough. From my point of view, Michael holds some kind of grudge and was looking for a reason to warn him, or 0ctocat just accidentally damaged him while having a different intention. Either way, Michael was WAY too harsh.

[quote="marijnishier" post=413913]Oke i see you might have damaged him with the slam. But why were you trying to get upthere int he first place? Your not allowed to abuse items like that or hide anything on a roof so theres no reason to use a slam for that kind of reason. I will contact a HA/ SA about this so they can look further into this i hope. Michael wasn't wrong by warning you as it is still attempted rdm and you should look out more. He was wrong not to listen to your side of the story. I hope i can try get help for you but you might not get unwarned.[/quote] How, in your right mind, could you EVER consider it attempted RDM? Let me get you the definition of attempt: [img size=400]https://i.gyazo.com/8dc4cc20044617063300957f59e666f9.png[/img] By his story, do you really think he was actively attempting to RDM him? Also, you are allowed to use slams like this, so I don't know what you're talking about. It can be used for raids, or he might just want to get onto a roof for fun. Michael shouldn't have got so close, as 0ctocat's intentions must've been clear enough. From my point of view, Michael holds some kind of grudge and was looking for a reason to warn him, or 0ctocat just accidentally damaged him while having a different intention. Either way, Michael was WAY too harsh.