RP Name: Nade Jones
Link to Steam Profile:steamcommunity.com/id/NadeJones/
SteamID:STEAM_0:0:76440963
GameTracker Server 1: www.gametracker.com/player/Nade%20Jones/...arpgaming.com:27015/
GameTracker Server 2 : www.gametracker.com/player/Nade%20Jones/...arpgaming.com:27025/

Age:15

Estimated Server Time: 5/6/7 Hours a day. About 1300 hours.
Languages I speak:English

Explain "Random Death Match" and give an example scenario:
Random DeathMatching is described as killing another player randomly without a hit or raid or without them even doing anything to you. Not having a valid RP reason to do so.
Example:You get sniped while walking down the streets - More than likely from a rooftop. The user did nothing malicious or a valid thing for that user to kill him. This is classed as Random Deathmatch, and can actually be warned providing there's evidence.

Explain "New Life Rule" and give an example scenario:
The new life rule is described to be when you die from whatever, or someone kills you. If you return back to that district without the timer being gone(Top of the screen) then that is classed as NLR which is against the rules. The timer is 3:00. Example, you die at the bank from a raid. You can't return to the district that the bank is in until the NLR timer at the top of the screen has gone. Returning back will result in a warn. By repeatedly doing it, that will become Mass NLR.

Explain "Metagaming" and give an example scenario:
Meta Gaming is one rule which every new player won't even know generally. It's essentially if you speak about the game or about your Roleplay character 'IN CHARACTER; that is fine, but if you continue the conversation 'OUT OF CHARACTER' (OOC) then you are metagaming. New players should be reminded that they should use /advert to speak their IN CHARACTER opinions and use /OOC when discussing terms like RDM or NLR. It's a fairly common rule that is broken.

Explain how you would handle the following situation: PLAYER x accuses player y for RDMing him, the console log shows that player y killed player x.
Firstly, I would check the logs to see if they were talking along the lines of death. To see if I could get a hang of the situation. By this, I mean that getting the reason for the RDM. If this wasn't the case, I'd say to Player Y ," why did you kill Player x and say that he killed you?". If infact there was a valid reason for Player Y to kill Player x then I wouldn't be putting any punishment against him. However, for Player x I would advise him to read the rules so that he can prevent this happening in the future. If Player Y actually RDMED Player x, I would put a punishment against Player Y - More than likely a Warning. Firstly, I'd gather evidence though.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:Player x accuses player y for breaking NLR, the kills are pretty CLOSE together in console (a few lines apart) at a peak time.
I'd gather the logs in the console to see what time Player X thinks that Player Y broke NLR. I'd check the times between and if they were super close meaning inside the 2:30 minutes then I would issue a warning to Player Y. However, if the kills were outside of the 2:30 Minutes limit then I would redirect Player X to the rules and let Player Y go. To prevent Player X making this mistake again , then I would suggest to him either counting himself using his mind or Use an actual timer elsewhere. If there was no strong evidence, then I would let them both off and watch Player Y for around 5-8 minutes just to be sure.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:PLAYER x calls for help in the OOC chat because his bank is being raided.
I would warn Player X firstly for calling help while using OOC. This is against the rules and is called MetaGaming. I would also redirect him to the rules and so that this problem can be prevented. I would get to the Bank and watch around the bank to see if there was anyone attacking the raiders. If so , I would ask them for a reason on attacking the raiders as this relates to the RDM Category. If not, then I shall warn them for MG and redirect them to the rules. Also, if it was a case of people coming over to protect the bank , I would definetly warn the banker as he commited a problem of getting others to MG.

Personally, I think I should be chosen because I am sophisticated and mature but also active. I Play Garry's Mod alot in my spare time. I am a fair person , who is willing to help out the community in whatever way possible and also, I will treat everyone the same way as I am a equal person. I will admit that I'm not active on forums, however, on game I am very active. If I was promoted to a Moderator, I will review all F1 Requests, despite other staff being on. In addition to this, the main thing that attracts me to applying for Moderator is having the responsibility and priority to deal with the player's problems. I am strict when it comes to particular things like these Roles but I can also be fun. I interact with the commuity a lot, always participate in the events. I won't take any problems through without evidence, unless it can be proven through the logs. If it is a conclusion of Word to Word then I suppose nothing can be done.