The Review
Explain "Random Death Match" and give an example scenario.
Random Death Match Is No Reason Killing People. Maybe I'm Going To Take Some Armor From Armor Npc And I Got Sniped Or Something. Thats RDM.<-- It's basically killing people with no valid RP reason, The example is good.

Explain "New Life Rule" and give an example scenario.
New Life Rule Is When You Die You Can Not Go To The District You Die For 3 Minutes. Maybe Raiders Raided My Base And I'm Died In Main District. I Can't Go To The Main District For 3 Minutes. <-- Definition is incomplete. NLR doesn't only reffer to districts, players can be breaking NLR even if they don't return to the same district.
The example is good.

Explain "Metagaming" and give an example scenario.
Metagaming Is Using OOC = Out Of Character Chat. If You Gonna Use It For Your Character It's Metagaming.
Maybe Someone's Base Got Raided. And Using OOC For Help. It's Metagaming.<-- The definition is vague. Metagaming is giving IC info OOC and also using OOC info IC.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for RDMing him, the console log shows that player y killed player x.
Player X Got Any Proof ? If He Got Y Will Get Warned. If The Y Lies Will Be 2 Warns. If Y Will Say The Truth Ofc Y Will Get 1 Warn.<-- What if player X has no proof? You can't just ask for proof from the beginning. What if player X actually got RDM'ed and didn't get to record it? You must ask player Y for a reason. If no valid reason is given, you can warn for RDM. Other than that, the only thing you can do, within the limits of common sense ofcourse, is try getting a confession for player Y. Proof should be asked for in the last part of the sit.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x accuses player y for breaking NLR, the kills are pretty close together in console (a few lines apart) at a peak time.
If X Have Proof I'll Warn The Player Y. If He Don't Have Proof But The Y Tells I Did It I'll Warn The Y.<-- You can't just go to an F1 saying "Proof?". You must listen to stories, check logs, consider the possibilites and situations. You must get player Y to confess, in the case player X has no proof. You must not ask for proof from the first part.

Explain how you would handle the following situation:
Player x calls for help in the OOC chat because his bank is being raided.
I'll Say ''Player X Please Don't Metagame.'' If He Gonna Do That Again I'll Warn Him.<-- Good handling on this one.

Result
Basically, your application is short. Definitions are vague, and handling most situations is wrong from my POV. You were however a moderator, and demoted for inactivity. Whilst being a mod, I don't recall see you abusing or such.
I will hold in my verdict for now, the final one probably being in the meeting.

[size=6][size=6]The Review[/size][/size] [b][color=#000000]Explain "Random Death Match" and give an example scenario.[/color][/b] [u][color=#000000]Random Death Match Is No Reason Killing People. Maybe I'm Going To Take Some Armor From Armor Npc And I Got Sniped Or Something. Thats RDM.[/color][/u][b]<-- It's basically killing people with no valid RP reason, The example is good.[/b] [b][color=#000000]Explain "New Life Rule" and give an example scenario.[/color][/b] [u][color=#000000]New Life Rule Is When You Die You Can Not Go To The District You Die For 3 Minutes. Maybe Raiders Raided My Base And I'm Died In Main District. I Can't Go To The Main District For 3 Minutes.[/color][/u] [b]<-- Definition is incomplete. NLR doesn't only reffer to districts, players can be breaking NLR even if they don't return to the same district. The example is good.[/b] [b][color=#000000]Explain "Metagaming" and give an example scenario.[/color][/b] [u][color=#000000]Metagaming Is Using OOC = Out Of Character Chat. If You Gonna Use It For Your Character It's Metagaming. Maybe Someone's Base Got Raided. And Using OOC For Help. It's Metagaming.[/color][/u][b]<-- The definition is vague. Metagaming is giving IC info OOC and also using OOC info IC.[/b] [b][color=#000000]Explain how you would handle the following situation: Player x accuses player y for RDMing him, the console log shows that player y killed player x.[/color][/b] [u][color=#000000]Player X Got Any Proof ? If He Got Y Will Get Warned. If The Y Lies Will Be 2 Warns. If Y Will Say The Truth Ofc Y Will Get 1 Warn.[/color][/u][b]<-- What if player X has no proof? You can't just ask for proof from the beginning. What if player X actually got RDM'ed and didn't get to record it? You must ask player Y for a reason. If no valid reason is given, you can warn for RDM. Other than that, the only thing you can do, within the limits of common sense ofcourse, is try getting a confession for player Y. Proof should be asked for in the last part of the sit.[/b] [b][color=#000000]Explain how you would handle the following situation: Player x accuses player y for breaking NLR, the kills are pretty close together in console (a few lines apart) at a peak time.[/color][/b] [u][color=#000000]If X Have Proof I'll Warn The Player Y. If He Don't Have Proof But The Y Tells I Did It I'll Warn The Y.[/color][/u][b]<-- You can't just go to an F1 saying "Proof?". You must listen to stories, check logs, consider the possibilites and situations. You must get player Y to confess, in the case player X has no proof. You must not ask for proof from the first part.[/b] [b][color=#000000]Explain how you would handle the following situation: Player x calls for help in the OOC chat because his bank is being raided.[/color][/b] [u][color=#000000]I'll Say ''Player X Please Don't Metagame.'' If He Gonna Do That Again I'll Warn Him.[/color][/u][b]<-- Good handling on this one.[/b] [size=5][color=#004400]Result[/color][/size] Basically, your application is short. Definitions are vague, and handling most situations is wrong from my POV. You were however a moderator, and demoted for inactivity. Whilst being a mod, I don't recall see you abusing or such. I will hold in my verdict for now, the final one probably being in the meeting. :neutralsp: