Review
Explain "Random Death Match" and give an example scenario:
Random Death Match, also known as RDM, is the situation in which someone kills another player without some kind of valid RP reason/situation, such as a raid. An example of RDM would be if Player X walked up to Player Y and killed him for no reason. However, an example of something that seems like RDM to a new player, but isn't, is if a wanted person kills a cop.
<-- Explanation is okay, same with the example. But bear in mind that being wanted does not give you the right to KOS all the cops.
Explain "New Life Rule" and give an example scenario:
New Life Rule, also known as NLR, is the period of time (3 minutes) in which you cannot interact with the district you last died in. Once NLR comes into effect, you are not allowed to use information from your previous life to give you RP advantages, e.g dying as a S.W.A.T then going to a different district to arrest the person who killed you. However, you are allowed to break NLR at the PD if you are a cop. An example of NLR is if you are raided and killed but still return to your base immediately.
<-- Good explanation, Good example.
Explain "Metagaming" and give an example scenario:
Metagaming, also known as meta, is when someone types as if they were in character and discusses in character information in out of character chat. An example of metagaming would be if Player X said to Player Y in OOC chat that his base is being raided. An example of something that isn't metagaming is if Player X asked for the price of an item in OOC chat.
<-- Explanation is good, so is the example, but metagaming is also using OOC info IC.
Explain how you would handle the following situation:
<em>Player X accuses Player Y for RDMing him, the console log shows that Player Y killed Player X.</em>
I would teleport both Player X and Player Y to a roof and ask both of them for their sides of the story. If Player X's story seemed convincing/Player X had proof and Player Y had no proof against it I would warn Player Y and tell him to read the rules. If Player X had insufficient/no proof/Player Y had proof that proved he was innocent I would tell Player X to get proof next time and say there was nothing I could do, then teleport them both back.
<-- Bear in mind, that certain rulebreakers are really smart and can make really convincing stories. Don't be gullible. You need to ask for the kill reason, and if he claims is valid, further proof is required.
Explain how you would handle the following situation:
<em>Player X accuses Player Y for breaking NLR, the kills are pretty close together in console (a few lines apart) at a peak time.</em>
I would teleport Player X to a roof and ask him for his side of the story and ask him for proof. If he didn't provide sufficient proof, I would tell him to record/take a screenshot next time and teleport him back. If he provided sufficient proof, I would teleport Player Y to the roof, inform him of the rule that he broke, warn him, then teleport them both back.
<-- Overall, not a bad way of handling, but you should listen to both sides, and try to get to a confession in case there is no proof.
Explain how you would handle the following situation:
<em>Player X calls for help in the OOC chat because his bank is being raided.</em>
I would tell Player X not to metagame and link him to the rules. If he stopped calling for help, I would continue doing whatever I was doing. If he didn't stop, I would warn him and tell him the metagaming rule myself.
<-- Good handling.
Conclusion
The application is good. You're a friendly person in-game and have improved a lot from your rather notorious past. If you can get your activity up and remain active, you got my vote.