You are showing screenshots of King that actually approves his evidence rather than yours. Also, from what king said here basicly says, You were warned for disrespecting. Anything wrong with that? Are you gonna go rant on the forums about this "so called ridiclious warn for no reason"
1 - He was not abusing powers and i understood why you got warned if you take a closer look to what king is actually saying.
He said that you were making fun of that person that was saying "MICK SPAMING" and got warned for it as Disrespect even though you just "explained" that you only said it once. That still means it is disrespect, no avoiding mate. In my eyes, that is a fair warning that should not be judged.
2 - Evidence actually helps the victim of the report (king), not you.
3 - Stupid report about some "fake" warn that you clearly don't understand what you are talking about, especially in the screenshots.

Disrespect is not a rule, saying mick spam once is not disrespect, The whole situation was blown way out of proportion because he went into the situation not even trying to grasp what it was about or who was involved, he got one name and muted and gagged me, I couldn't argue my case. He had no evidence that I started it since I said it once and it was when king was not present.