Discriminating age won't help, more requirements would though.

I.e: Recent warnings last longer, 50 hours minimum gametime, perfect answers to application.

It seems like people are getting accepted way too easily, or perhaps, people get demoted easier. Like if they slip up slightly a couple of times it could happen.

Remember, people 16 and under will be the most active too. Since people 16+ might be in college, university or even have a full time/ part time job. All of which hit hard on your free time.

So, would you rather have staff who are rarely on, but do a good job, or staff who are always on, some who do a decent job, and some who might not.

I know what I would pick.

I'm not hating, just putting my opinion out there.

Discriminating age won't help, more requirements would though. I.e: Recent warnings last longer, 50 hours minimum gametime, perfect answers to application. It seems like people are getting accepted way too easily, or perhaps, people get demoted easier. Like if they slip up slightly a couple of times it could happen. Remember, people 16 and under will be the most active too. Since people 16+ might be in college, university or even have a full time/ part time job. All of which hit hard on your free time. So, would you rather have staff who are rarely on, but do a good job, or staff who are always on, some who do a decent job, and some who might not. I know what I would pick. I'm not hating, just putting my opinion out there.