I don't fully understand your motive for the post ID #119285. Let me know if I'm on the right track.

You argued previously that I am ignorant to your point where you feel that you are not a repeat offender of the aforementioned accusation.

I pointed out that you have broken rule 1.7 on two occasions.


You then attempt to justify your actions on both occasions:


...but as expressed earlier, ignorance - in all forms - to the rules is not an acceptable reason for violation of them as such.

Also, I don't see why you keep adding these futile clauses into your argument, they are really of no pertinence and you don't seem to be able to upkeep the promises that you make in them, for example:



If you are demonstrating your ignorance by unsubscribing, please maintain that ignorance by not responding anymore because your comment looses all of its pre-acquired sass






Please, make your mind up!