Name - (What is the accused person's name?)
CodComedyTJ

Steam-ID - (What is the accused person's Steam-ID?)
STEAM_0:0:80776871

Evidence of Steam-ID - (Screenshot or video of the accused players Steam-ID)
Not nessecary: the user submitted evidence of their own gameplay footage on the forums.

Server - (What server was this on?)
SSRP

Time and date (CET) - (When did it happend?)
Uncertain.

Other comments - (Anything else you want to add?)
None.

Reason - (What rules did the person break?)


Story - (What happened?)
Within the screenshots of the accused's first-person view herein, he is depicted using the physgun to rotate a chair upside down whilst someone is sat in it.

Proof - (Any proof (video or screenshot) that clearly shows what happened.)
He is accused of violating rule 1.7 as he explicitly mentioned his intentions: to give a 'chair ride'.
cloud-4.steamusercontent.com/ugc/5385191...89B07A20E115CF667FF/

cloud-4.steamusercontent.com/ugc/5385191...BDF431913D5D2F221DD/

I am assuming that it is not an intentional feature that it is allowed to physgun chairs as they are sometimes used in order to gain access to areas in an unrealistic manner. You may feel that this was harmless, however this could have adversely affected the roleplay of the character with the sniper (or, anyone else for that matter) as he may have had the intention of killing the person in the chair for various reasons (e.g. avenging a friend, taking revenge for a failed raid), however is in a slightly awkward position to do so because they are DEFYING GRAVITY.

Additionally, CodComedyTJ could be found to have made an attempt to 'cause trouble' through slander on a recent ban request:


Herein, there are various defamatory statements made with no premise (none of the 'evidence' can be considered to be valid):
puu.sh/h2dBA/b588cd0cba.png

Finally, a screenshot and link to the original ban-request where evidence that he provided has been sourced from:
puu.sh/h2dEF/0b47ac0b5b.png
zarpgaming.com/index.php/forum/report-ab...gaming-watson-darkrp

Additional:
Since initially composing the report, I have gathered further evidence of other instances where the accused has violated the TOU. The evidence is submitted followed by the terms as outlined in the TOU that I feel it is in breach of.

Sustained reference to his intention not to fully take into account my posting - fails to contribute, not civil, impolite, non-constructive, mean-spirited and with intent to cause problems (trouble).






Defamatory posting content



Direct ignorance to full purpose of report - non-constructive



Sarcastic reference to a fabricated 'friendship' through colloquialism - non-constructive, mean-spirited, impolite


Slander - Inappropriate premise for outright accusation


NB: the aforementioned 'direct ignorance' (can be considered direct as he has repeatedly made comments in this manner) is also a pursuit of causing trouble as he has little interest for an outstanding report made against him, thus demonstrating a lack of interest for the fact that he has potentially violated rules.

[b]Name - (What is the accused person's name?)[/b] CodComedyTJ [b]Steam-ID - (What is the accused person's Steam-ID?)[/b] STEAM_0:0:80776871 [b]Evidence of Steam-ID - (Screenshot or video of the accused players Steam-ID)[/b] Not nessecary: the user submitted evidence of their own gameplay footage on the forums. [b]Server - (What server was this on?)[/b] SSRP [b]Time and date (CET) - (When did it happend?)[/b] Uncertain. [b]Other comments - (Anything else you want to add?)[/b] None. [b]Reason - (What rules did the person break?)[/b] [img]http://puu.sh/h2dkC/c392617ac7.png[/img] [b]Story - (What happened?)[/b] Within the screenshots of the accused's first-person view herein, he is depicted using the physgun to rotate a chair upside down whilst someone is sat in it. [b]Proof - (Any proof (video or screenshot) that clearly shows what happened.)[/b] He is accused of violating rule 1.7 as he explicitly mentioned his intentions: to give a 'chair ride'. http://cloud-4.steamusercontent.com/ugc/538519137276316488/AFD61DE9E96C4EA60B4DF89B07A20E115CF667FF/ http://cloud-4.steamusercontent.com/ugc/538519137276315212/662FC66FB642398FB6573BDF431913D5D2F221DD/ I am assuming that it is not an intentional feature that it is allowed to physgun chairs as they are sometimes used in order to gain access to areas in an unrealistic manner. You may feel that this was harmless, however this could have adversely affected the roleplay of the character with the sniper (or, anyone else for that matter) as he may have had the intention of killing the person in the chair for various reasons (e.g. avenging a friend, taking revenge for a failed raid), however is in a slightly awkward position to do so because they are[b] DEFYING GRAVITY.[/b] Additionally, CodComedyTJ could be found to have made an attempt to 'cause trouble' through slander on a recent ban request: [img]http://puu.sh/h2dvM/fbfcf43919.png[/img] Herein, there are various defamatory statements made with no premise (none of the 'evidence' can be considered to be valid): http://puu.sh/h2dBA/b588cd0cba.png Finally, a screenshot and link to the original ban-request where evidence that he provided has been sourced from: http://puu.sh/h2dEF/0b47ac0b5b.png http://zarpgaming.com/index.php/forum/report-abuse/44355-cybergaming-watson-darkrp [b]Additional:[/b] Since initially composing the report, I have gathered further evidence of other instances where the accused has violated the TOU. The evidence is submitted followed by the terms as outlined in the TOU that I feel it is in breach of. [b]Sustained reference to his intention not to fully take into account my posting - fails to contribute, not civil, impolite, non-constructive, mean-spirited and with intent to cause problems (trouble).[/b] [img]http://puu.sh/h2jSl/d61a7facc2.png[/img] [img]http://puu.sh/h2jSZ/ea03c2eb29.png[/img] [img]http://puu.sh/h2jTT/4f9bb084a3.png[/img] [img]http://puu.sh/h2jUr/8f215e41b0.png[/img] [img]http://puu.sh/h2jXA/2694d7d1bc.png[/img] [b]Defamatory posting content[/b] [img]http://puu.sh/h2jYC/aabb092f04.png[/img] [img]http://puu.sh/h2jZX/68b9a68e49.png[/img] [b]Direct ignorance to full purpose of report - non-constructive[/b] [img]http://puu.sh/h2k32/588dba7b13.png[/img] [img]http://puu.sh/h2k4W/af3aecbbea.png[/img] [b]Sarcastic reference to a fabricated 'friendship' through colloquialism - non-constructive, mean-spirited, impolite[/b] [img]http://puu.sh/h2klb/eff004bc36.png[/img] [b]Slander - Inappropriate premise for outright accusation[/b] [img]http://puu.sh/h7DYP/8d55bafbde.jpg[/img] [i]NB: the aforementioned 'direct ignorance' (can be considered direct as he has repeatedly made comments in this manner) is also a pursuit of causing trouble as he has little interest for an outstanding report made against him, thus demonstrating a lack of interest for the fact that he has potentially violated rules.[/i]