Dcxbigdaddy wrote:
Look you all can say what you want but just think about it. It wouldn't have made a difference if his application was the same as Patrick's or if it was 5 paragraphs long and if you say it did make a difference and you take that into consideration then that's just sad because that would mean Jack would have an even lesser chance for doing the same exact thing patrick did and that just doesn't make sense to me.


Fennster wrote: If you read you would see that I meant this only for global mod applications which there are always very few of... I don't get where you got the idea I was suggesting this for every staff position.

[quote="Dcxbigdaddy" post=109877] You're wrong and you have no idea what you are talking about. How can you sit there and tell me it was a waste of time and that it didn't make a impact on our decision. You wasn't in the meeting and wouldn't know what we take into consideration.[/quote] Look you all can say what you want but just think about it. It wouldn't have made a difference if his application was the same as Patrick's or if it was 5 paragraphs long and if you say it did make a difference and you take that into consideration then that's just sad because that would mean Jack would have an even lesser chance for doing the same exact thing patrick did and that just doesn't make sense to me. [quote=Fennster] We have our voting system for a reason. If we interviewed everyone that applied for staff, it would take a long time. I understand that this was kinda like "a big deal", but the voting system is fast, easy, and in my opinion, the best option to decide on staff positions.[/quote] If you read you would see that I meant this only for global mod applications which there are always very few of... I don't get where you got the idea I was suggesting this for every staff position.